Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

This section is now closed. Click here for new judgements

Home › All Judgements › DCIT vs. ING Investment (ITAT Mumbai)

DCIT vs. ING Investment (ITAT Mumbai)

Posted on by editor
COURT:
CORAM:
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: October 10, 2008 (Date of publication)
AY:
FILE:
CITATION:

(1) For purposes of s. 14A, only the expenditure which is proved to have a nexus with the exempt income can be disallowed and not on an ad-hoc basis.

(2) Sub-secs (2) and (3) of s. 14A inserted with effect from the AY 2007-2008 {and Rule 8D} (which sanction proportionate disallowance) are prospective and do not apply to earlier assessment years.

Note: The judgement of the Bombay ITAT in Citicorp Finance 108 ITD 457 was not followed.

See Also: New Rule 8D – A lesson in tight rope walking?

Related Judgements

  1. ITO vs. Ellora Silk Mills (ITAT Mumbai) 

    (i) Where the AO had accepted in the past that the warehousing charges received by the assessee was business income, he was not justified in reopening the assessment to assess the charges as property income in the absense of any … ITO vs. Ellora Silk Mills (ITAT Mumbai)…
  2. Narang Overseas vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai 5 Member Special Bench) 

    (i) The judgement of the SC in Mariappa Gounder vs. CIT 232 ITR 2 does not decide whether mesne profits received against wrongful possession of property is in the nature of revenue receipt or capital receipt. It merely decides the … Narang Overseas vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai 5…
  3. Development Consultants vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) 

    Where the assessee entered into “international transactions” with “associated enterprises” and the AO made adjustments to the arms length price, held, deleting the adjustments that:

    (i) In order to determine the most appropriate method for determining the arm’s length price, it is first necessary to select the ‘tested party’ and…
  4. M/s B. G. Chitale vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune – Special Bench) 

    The process of pasteurisation of milk does not amount to manufacture / processing for purposes of sections 80-I and 80-HHA as while pastuerised milk is improved in quality, it is not a commercially different product as compared to raw milk.
    Read more ›
  5. ITO vs. Lotia Co.op Hsg. Soc. (ITAT Mumbai) 

    Where the assessee was a co.op society and it and its members entered into a development agreement with a builder pursuant to which Tranferable Development Rights (TDR) entitled to be received under the Development Control Regulations was assigned to the developer for the repairs and redevelopment of the…