{"id":17592,"date":"2017-11-25T11:57:40","date_gmt":"2017-11-25T06:27:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/?p=17592"},"modified":"2017-11-25T11:57:40","modified_gmt":"2017-11-25T06:27:40","slug":"m-s-sainath-enterprises-vs-acit-itat-mumbai-third-member-withdrawal-of-appeal-the-petitioner-plaintiff-is-the-dominus-litis-and-it-is-open-to-him-to-pursue-or-abandon-his-case-wit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/m-s-sainath-enterprises-vs-acit-itat-mumbai-third-member-withdrawal-of-appeal-the-petitioner-plaintiff-is-the-dominus-litis-and-it-is-open-to-him-to-pursue-or-abandon-his-case-wit\/","title":{"rendered":"M\/s Sainath Enterprises vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Third Member)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Withdrawal of appeal: The Petitioner\/ Plaintiff is the \u2018dominus litis\u2019 and it is open to him to pursue or abandon his case. Withdrawal cannot be denied except when the person making the prayer has obtained some advantage\/ benefit which he seeks to retain<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Withdrawal of appeal: The Petitioner\/ Plaintiff is the \u2018dominus litis\u2019 and it is open to him to pursue or abandon his case. Withdrawal cannot be denied except when the person making the prayer has obtained some advantage\/ benefit which he seeks to retain<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/m-s-sainath-enterprises-vs-acit-itat-mumbai-third-member-withdrawal-of-appeal-the-petitioner-plaintiff-is-the-dominus-litis-and-it-is-open-to-him-to-pursue-or-abandon-his-case-wit\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-judgements","category-tribunal","judges-dev-darshan-sud-j","section-1084","section-957","counsel-m-subramanian","court-itat-mumbai","catchwords-withdrawal-of-appeal","genre-domestic-tax"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17592"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17592\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}