{"id":2388,"date":"2010-12-20T15:25:24","date_gmt":"2010-12-20T09:55:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/?p=2388"},"modified":"2010-12-20T15:25:24","modified_gmt":"2010-12-20T09:55:24","slug":"cit-vs-west-bengal-infrastructure-development-finance-corp-supreme-court-deparetment-appeals-should-not-be-dismissed-for-delay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/cit-vs-west-bengal-infrastructure-development-finance-corp-supreme-court-deparetment-appeals-should-not-be-dismissed-for-delay\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT vs. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corp (Supreme Court)"},"content":{"rendered":"<table width=\"150\" height=\"125\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/?dl_id=302\" onclick=\"if (event.button==0) \r\n     setTimeout(function () { window.location = 'http:\/\/itatonline.org\/downloads.php?varname=dl_id=302&varname2=west_bengal_delay.pdf'; }, 100)\" ><strong>Click here to download the judgement (west_bengal_delay.pdf) <\/strong> <\/a><\/p><br \/>\n          <!--\n\n\/* 125x125, created 12\/12\/10 *\/\ngoogle_ad_slot = \"0686453411\";\ngoogle_ad_width = 125;\ngoogle_ad_height = 125;\n\/\/--><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Dept&#8217;s Appeals Should Not be Dismissed For Delay<\/p>\n<p><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The High Court dismissed the department&#8217;s appeal on the ground of delay. On appeal to the Supreme Court, HELD allowing the appeal:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Looking to the amount of tax involved in this case, we are of the view that the High Court ought to have decided the matter on merits. <strong>In all such cases where there is delay on the part of the Department, we request the High Court to consider imposing costs but <em>certainly it should examine the cases on merits and should not dispose of cases merely on the ground of delay<\/em>, particularly when huge stakes are involved<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"journal2\">\nSee Also: <strong>I<a href=\"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/index.php\/improvement-trust-vs-ujagar-singh-supreme-court-unless-mala-fides-are-writ-large-delay-should-be-condoned-matters-should-be-disposed-of-on-merits-and-not-technicalities\">mprovement Trust vs. Ujagar Singh<\/a><\/strong> (SC): <em>Unless mala fides are writ large, delay should be condoned<\/em> and <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/blog\/index.php\/finance-bill-2010-grasim-superseded-but-whither-accountability\/\">Finance Bill 2010: Grasim superseded .. but whither accountability?<\/a><\/strong> &#038; <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/blog\/index.php\/a-collosal-waste-of-tax-resources\/\">A collosal waste of tax resources!<\/a><\/strong>. Based on the earlier stern stand of the Courts, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/filing-slps-dept-takes-stern-view-pins-responsibility-on-cit-to-avoid-delay\/\">the Department had taken steps to fix accountability for timely filing of appeals<\/a>.\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Department&#8217;s Appeals Should Not be Dismissed For Delay<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/cit-vs-west-bengal-infrastructure-development-finance-corp-supreme-court-deparetment-appeals-should-not-be-dismissed-for-delay\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-judgements","category-supreme-court"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}