{"id":4633,"date":"2012-04-04T04:26:10","date_gmt":"2012-04-04T04:26:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/?p=4633"},"modified":"2012-04-04T04:26:10","modified_gmt":"2012-04-04T04:26:10","slug":"in-re-a-mauritus-aar-selective-buy-back-of-shares-in-lieu-of-dividend-is-a-colourable-transaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/in-re-a-mauritus-aar-selective-buy-back-of-shares-in-lieu-of-dividend-is-a-colourable-transaction\/","title":{"rendered":"In re A Mauritus (AAR)"},"content":{"rendered":"<table width=\"150\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\">\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/?dl_id=677\" onclick=\"if (event.button==0) \r\n     setTimeout(function () { window.location = 'http:\/\/itatonline.org\/downloads.php?varname=dl_id=677&varname2=mauritius_dividend_buy_back_shares.pdf'; }, 100)\" ><strong>Click here to download the judgement (mauritius_dividend_buy_back_shares.pdf) <\/strong> <\/a><\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong><br \/>\nSelective buy-back of shares in lieu of dividend is a &#8220;colourable transaction&#8221;<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Applicant&#8217;s shares were held 48.87 % by a US company &#038; 25.06% by a Mauritius company. The rest was held by a Singapore company and the public. The Mauritius company was ultimately held by another US company. Since 1.4.2003, when s. 115-O was introduced, <em>the Applicant did not (to avoid DDT) distribute dividend<\/em>. Instead, it let its reserves grow and offered a buy-back in the year 2008. <em>The buy-back was accepted only by the Mauritius company<\/em>, in whose hands the capital gains u\/s 46A, were not assessable under the India-Mauritius DTAA. The other shareholders did not accept the offer. A second offer was proposed which also was accepted only by the Mauritius company and not by the other shareholders. The Applicant sought a ruling on whether the gains as a result of the buy-back would be capital gains u\/s 46A in the hands of the Mauritius company and exempt under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAA. HELD by the AAR; <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Though the Applicant was making regular profits, it did not declare any dividends after the introduction of s. 115-O and allowed its reserves to grow. This was only to avoid paying DDT. <strong>The buy-back was a &#8220;colourable device&#8221; devised to avoid tax on distributed profits u\/s 115-O because while it would result in repatriation of funds to the Mauritius company, that would constitute &#8220;capital gains&#8221; in the hands of the recipient, and not be assessable to tax in India under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAA<\/strong>. The fact that the other major shareholders did not accept the buy-back was significant. A buy-back results in a release of accumulated profits which is assessable as &#8220;dividend&#8221;. The exemption to treat the buy-back proceeds as capital gains is only in respect of a genuine buy-back of shares. As the transaction is colourable, it is <strong>not a transaction in the eye of law and has to be ignored<\/strong> and the arrangement has to be treated as a distribution of profits by a company to its shareholders which is assessable as dividend in the hands of the recipient. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"journal2\">\nSee also <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/index.php\/in-re-rst-aar-s-47iv-relief-not-available-if-holding-co-and-nominees-hold-100-of-subsidiary\/\">In Re RST<\/a><\/strong> (AAR) where s. 46A was considered<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--\n\n\n\n\n\n\/\/--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Though the Applicant was making regular profits, it did not declare any dividends after the introduction of s. 115-O and allowed its reserves to grow. This was only to avoid paying DDT. <strong>The buy-back was a &#8220;colourable device&#8221; devised to avoid tax on distributed profits u\/s 115-O because while it would result in repatriation of funds to the Mauritius company, that would constitute &#8220;capital gains&#8221; in the hands of the recipient, and not be assessable to tax in India under Article 13 of the India-Mauritius DTAA<\/strong>. The fact that the other major shareholders did not accept the buy-back was significant. A buy-back results in a release of accumulated profits which is assessable as &#8220;dividend&#8221;. The exemption to treat the buy-back proceeds as capital gains is only in respect of a genuine buy-back of shares. As the transaction is colourable, it is <strong>not a transaction in the eye of law and has to be ignored<\/strong> and the arrangement has to be treated as a distribution of profits by a company to its shareholders which is assessable as dividend in the hands of the recipient<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/in-re-a-mauritus-aar-selective-buy-back-of-shares-in-lieu-of-dividend-is-a-colourable-transaction\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4633","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aar","category-all-judgements"],"acf":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}