{"id":3893,"date":"2017-04-05T14:37:23","date_gmt":"2017-04-05T09:07:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/?p=3893"},"modified":"2017-04-05T14:37:50","modified_gmt":"2017-04-05T09:07:50","slug":"income-computation-and-disclosure-standards-icds-an-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/income-computation-and-disclosure-standards-icds-an-update\/","title":{"rendered":"Income Computation And Disclosure Standards (ICDS) &#8211; An Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/Dhaval-Desai.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"79\" height=\"100\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-3899\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>There have been a spate of amendments to the various Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) prescribed by the Central Government under section 145 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. CA Dhaval Desai has systematically analyzed all the ICDS issued up to date and explained their implications in a concise manner <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Section (S.) 145 of the  Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA) provides that taxable income of an assessee falling  under the heads &ldquo;Profits and gains of business or profession&rdquo; or &ldquo;Income from  other sources&rdquo;, shall be computed in accordance with either cash or mercantile  system of accounting which is regularly employed by the assessee. It further  provides that the Central Government (CG) may notify, from time to time, Income  Computation &amp; Disclosure Standards (ICDS) to be followed by any class of  taxpayers or in respect of any class of income. <\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>  Based on the recommendations  of the ICDS Committee and public representations on the draft ICDS, the CG had  notified 10 ICDS (&lsquo;ICDS 2015&rsquo;) vide notification&nbsp;dated 31 March 2015 for  compliance by all assessees following mercantile system of accounting for  computing &lsquo;business&rsquo; and &lsquo;other sources&rsquo; income w.e.f. 1 April 2015. <\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/FNjT9hj93i4?rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Bdk3F04_sfs?rel=0\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><br \/>\nHowever, several issues were  raised by stakeholders on &lsquo;ICDS 2015&rsquo; and thereafter CG referred the issues to  the ICDS Committee for issuing proper clarifications\/ guidance. In the interim,  CG also deferred the effective date of ICDS applicability by one year (i.e. to  FY 2016-17) pending issue of appropriate clarifications\/ guidance by ICDS  Committee as well as revision of the Tax Audit Report to capture disclosures  required in terms of ICDS.<\/p>\n<p>  The ICDS Committee after  considering the issues raised by stakeholders, suggested a two-step approach  for smooth implementation of ICDS i.e.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Changes in the  ICDS 2015; and<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Issue of FAQs  for clarifying on rest of the pending issues.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Considering the ICDS  Committee recommendations, CG rescinded<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref1\"> (1) <\/a> the ICDS 2015 and notified  revised<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref2\"> (2) <\/a> ICDS (&lsquo;revised ICDS&rsquo;) to be  applicable from FY 2016-17 and thereafter. Further, CG amended<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref3\"> (3) <\/a> Form 3CD (tax audit report)  for ICDS related disclosure requirements and for quantifying adjustment to  profits or loss for complying with ICDS.<\/p>\n<p>    <strong>The following table provides a glimpse of changes brought in through  revised ICDS as well provides details (in brief) of clarifications provided by  CBDT through FAQs:<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>        <strong>Caption<\/strong> <\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><strong>Particulars<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>1. General<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS does not    apply to individuals\/ HUF not required to get their accounts audited under    S.44AB of ITA<\/span> <\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Under    transitional provision of each ICDS, consequential changes are made to give    effect to the change in effective date of ICDS applicability i.e. FY 2016-17<\/span> <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS are not    meant for maintenance of books of accounts\/ preparing financial statements    however, accounting policies mentioned in ICDS-I (Accounting Policies) being    fundamental in nature shall apply while computing &lsquo;business&rsquo; and &lsquo;other    sources&rsquo; income (Q.1)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Provisions of    ICDS are notified, after due deliberations and examination of judicial    precedents, to bring certainty and therefore shall be applicable to such    transactional issues, even if inconsistent with judicial precedents (Q.2)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">In case of    conflict between ICDS and Income Tax Rules, 1962 (&lsquo;Rules&rsquo;), Rules shall    prevail over ICDS (Q.4)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS apply for    computation of &lsquo;business&rsquo; and &lsquo;other sources&rsquo; income, irrespective of the    accounting standards adopted by the companies i.e. either accounting    standards or Ind-AS (Q.5)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS    provisions are applicable to the assessee&rsquo;s computing income under the    presumptive tax scheme [e.g. ICDS-III (Construction Contracts)&nbsp; or ICDS IV (Revenue recognition) shall    apply for determining receipts\/ turnover presumptive income of a firm under    S. 44AD of ITA] (Q.3)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Provisions of    ICDS shall apply for computation of income liable to tax on gross basis like    interest, royalty and fee for technical services for non-residents under    S.115A of the ITA (Q.14)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">General    provisions of ICDS not applicable to the assessee&rsquo;s governed by sector    specific provisions contained in ITA or ICDS (Q.7)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS not    applicable for computing Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) under S.115JB of the    ITA since MAT is computed on &lsquo;book profit&rsquo; i.e. Net profit as per P&amp;L a\/c    prepared under Companies Act, 2013 subject to specified adjustments in ITA    (Q.6)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS    applicable for computing Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), applicable to    non-corporate assessee, since AMT is computed on adjusted total income based    on the normal provisions of the ITA, subject to specified adjustments (Q.6)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Net effect on    the income due to application of ICDS to be disclosed in tax return. Further,    the disclosures required as per ICDS shall be made in the tax audit report    however there shall not be any separate disclosure requirements for    assessee&rsquo;s who are not liable tax audit (Q.25)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>2. ICDS-I (Accounting Policies)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>No Change<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Market to    Market (MTM) loss or expected loss shall not be recognised unless permitted    by any other ICDS however is silent on MTM gains or expected profits. FAQs    provides that the same principle, on a mutatis mutandis basis, shall apply to    MTM gains or expected profits (Q.8)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">An accounting    policy shall not be changed without &lsquo;reasonable cause&rsquo;. However the term    &lsquo;reasonable cause&rsquo; is undefined. FAQs state that &lsquo;reasonable cause&rsquo; is an    existing concept and has evolved well over a period of time, conferring desired    flexibility to the taxpayer in deserving cases (Q.9)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS-I shall    govern those derivatives which are not covered within the scope of    ICDS-VI\/VIII. Therefore, MTM loss on such derivatives may not be tax    deductible (Q.10)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>3. ICDS-II (Inventory valuation)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS 2015    provided items which will form part of &lsquo;cost of services&rsquo; in case of a    &lsquo;service provider&rsquo;. The reference to &lsquo;service provider&rsquo; is omitted from the    cost of services however the ambiguity continues with regards to    applicability of inventory valuation to service provider as the same is not    included in scope exclusion of ICDS-II as provided in the scope exclusion of    accounting standard dealing with Valuation of Inventories<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Standard    costing method of inventory valuation permitted if standard cost approximates    actual cost<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">In respect of    retail method of measuring inventory, cost is determined by reducing    appropriate percentage of gross margin from the sales value. ICDS now    requires that an average percentage for each retail department under retail    method is to be mandatorily used<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>No FAQs related to ICDS-II<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>4. ICDS    III &ndash; Construction Contract<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Transitional    provisions now provide for complete grandfathering in respect of construction    contracts which commenced on or before 31 March 2016 but not completed by the    said date and therefore contract revenue and contract costs from such    construction contracts shall be recognised based on the method regularly    followed by the assessee&rsquo;s prior to 31 March 2016 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Retention    money needs to be recognised as revenue on billing if there is reasonable    certainty of its ultimate collection, even if such receipt is contingent on    satisfaction of certain performance criteria (Q.11)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">As presently    there are no ICDS notified for real estate developers, built operate transfer    projects and leases and therefore these transactions shall be governed by the    existing provisions of ITL and ICDS, as may be applicable (Q.12)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>5. ICDS IV    &ndash; Revenue Recognition<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><strong><em>Revenue recognition criteria for service contracts <\/em><\/strong><em>(in    addition to percentage completion method (POCM) as provided by &lsquo;ICDS 2015&rsquo;)<\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Option provided to recognise service revenue    on straight line basis, over the specific period, in a case where the    services are provided by an indeterminate number of acts over a specific    period of time<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Option provided to recognise service    revenue on completion or when substantially completed, in a case where    duration of the service contract is not more than 90 days<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Transitional provisions of ICDS-IV is    linked to transitional provisions of ICDS III and therefore service contract    which commenced on or before 31 March 2016 but not completed by the said date    shall be recognised based on the method <\/span>regularly followed by the    assessee prior to 31 March 2016 <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong><em>Revenue    recognition criteria for interest income <\/em><\/strong><em>(in    addition to recognition on time basis as provided by &lsquo;ICDS 2015&rsquo;)<\/em><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Interest on refund of any <\/span>tax, duty or cess shall    deemed to be the income of the year in which such interest is received by the    assessee <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Interest    accrues on time basis and royalty accrues on the contractual term and    therefore needs to be recognised even when the criteria of reasonable    certainty of ultimate collection is not met. Any subsequent non-recovery in    either cases can be claimed as bad debts under S.36(1)(vii) of the ITA.    Further, specific provisions of ITA (e.g. S.43D) shall prevail over the    provisions of ICDS (Q.13)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>6. ICDS V    &ndash; Tangible assets<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>No    significant change <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Expenses incurred after    trial run and experimental production but before commencing commercial    production, shall need to be capitalised (Q.15)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>7. ICDS VI    &ndash; Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Distinction    between integral and non-integral foreign operation removed. Accordingly, it    now requires that financial statements of a foreign operation should be    translated as if the transactions of the foreign operation are that of the    taxpayer himself, irrespective of whether foreign operations are integral or    non-integral.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Non-monetary    item, being inventory, which is carried at net realisable value shall be    converted by using the exchange rate that existed when such value was    determined<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Foreign currency    translation reserve balance as on 1 April 2016 (opening balance) pertaining    to exchange differences on monetary items for non-integral operations shall    be recognised in the financial year 2016-17 to the extent not recognised as    income in the past (Q.16)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>8. ICDS    VII &ndash; Government Grants<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>No    significant change <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Transitional provisions    require recognition of government grant as per ICDS which meet the    recognition criteria on or after 1 April 2016. Further, ICDS provides that    recognition shall not be postponed beyond actual receipt and therefore    government grants actually received prior to 1 April 2016 shall deemed to be    recognised on its receipt and accordingly shall not be governed by ICDS but    shall be governed by the existing provisions of the ITA.<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref4\"> (4) <\/a> (Q.17)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>9. ICDS    VIII &ndash; Securities<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Definition of securities amended to include    share of a company in which public are not substantially interested<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">In addition to FIFO method, revised ICDS    now also permits weighted average method for ascertainment of cost of    securities<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Revised ICDS introduces new &lsquo;Part B&rsquo; to    deal with securities (which includes derivatives within its ambit) held by <\/span>scheduled bank or public    financial institutions and provides that the classification, recognition and    measurement of securities shall be in accordance with the extant guidelines    issued by Reserve Bank of India and any claim for deduction in excess of the    said guidelines shall not be permissible. To this extent, provisions of    ICDS-VI relating to forward exchange contract shall not apply <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Interest    income on securities which was taxed on accrual basis however not actually    received till the date of sale of such security (broken period interest),    shall be allowable as deduction while computing income arising from sale of    such security (Q.18)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Illustration    provided in the FAQ on valuation of securities based on the accounting    standards (i.e. individual scrip wise) as well as based on the bucket    approach as suggested in ICDS (i.e. category-wise valuation). The    illustration highlights that valuation as per ICDS may be higher than    valuation as per books on individual scrip-wise basis (Q.19)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>10. ICDS IX    &#8211; Borrowing cost<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">ICDS 2015 did not provide the criterion of    substantial period of time<\/span><a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref5\"> (5) <\/a> for classifying any tangible or intangible asset    (except for inventory) as qualifying asset requiring capitalisation for    specific as well as general purpose borrowing <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Amended ICDS provides that qualifying asset shall be    such assets, for the general purpose borrowing, that necessarily require a    period &gt; 12 months for the acquisition, construction or production.    However, no threshold is provided for borrowing for specific purpose<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Amendments made in normative formulae for    computing general purpose borrowing cost<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Period clarified when the capitalisation    will cease; and<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Certain amendments in the formulae to    exclude specific borrowing cost as well as the assets related to specific    purpose borrowing.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Borrowing cost    considered for capitalisation shall exclude borrowing cost which are    specifically disallowed under the specific provisions of the ITA (Q.20)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Bill    discounting charges and other similar charges are covered under the    definition of borrowing cost (Q.21)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Allocation of    general borrowing cost amongst different qualifying assets shall be done on    asset-by-asset basis (Q.22)<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"601\" colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\"><strong>11. ICDS X    &#8211; Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Revised ICDS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>No    significant change <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"85\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>FAQs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"516\" valign=\"top\">\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Illustration    provided to explain the impact of transitional provision which were    introduced with the intent that there should neither be double taxation nor    should there be escape of any income due to application of ICDS from a    particular date (refer note for the illustration) (Q.23)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\">Provisioning    for employee benefits which are otherwise covered by accounting standard<\/span><a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftnref6\"> (6) <\/a> shall continue to be    governed by specific provisions of ITA and are not dealt with by ICDS (Q.24)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>Reader are also requested to  note that while ICDS has been postponed to FY 2016-17 onwards however certain  amendments (refer section 2(24)(xviii) relating to taxability of government  grant and proviso to section 36(1)(iiii) which deals with disallowance of  interest cost for assets not put to use) as carried out by Finance Act 2015 in  the ITA are also in the statue book and are already in force from 1 April 2015. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Note: Impact of  transitional provisions of ICDS-X as explained by way of illustration in the  FAQ (Q.23)<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"100%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><strong>No.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><strong>Particulars <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><strong>Amounts in million<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>A<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Provision required as per    ICDS as on 31 March 2017 for items brought forward from 31 March 2016<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p align=\"center\">30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>B<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Provisions as per ICDS for    FY 2016-17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p align=\"center\">50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>C<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Total gross provision (A+B)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p align=\"center\">80<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>D<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Less: Provision already    recognised in computation of taxable income in FY 2015-16 or earlier years<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p align=\"center\">20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"38\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>E<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"415\" valign=\"top\">\n<p>Net provision as per ICDS    in FY 2016-17 to be recognised as per transition provision<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"148\" valign=\"top\">\n<p align=\"center\">60<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div>\n<div id=\"ftn1\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn1\"> <\/a> (1) Notification  No. 86 of 2016 dated 29 September 2016<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"ftn2\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn2\"> <\/a> (2) Notification  No. 87 of 2016 dated 29 September 2016<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"ftn3\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn3\"> <\/a> (3) Notification No. 88 of 2016 dated 29 September 2016<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"ftn4\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn4\"> <\/a> (4) This is irrespective of the fact that the  conditions attached to such grant are satisfied on or after 1 April 2016<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"ftn5\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn5\"> <\/a> (5) Generally,  a period of 12 months is considered as a substantial period of time<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div id=\"ftn6\">\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\" title=\"\" id=\"_ftn6\"> <\/a> (6) Accounting Standard 15 on Employee Benefits<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"journal2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/icds-notification-290916\/\">Click here to download Notification No.87\/2016, F.No.133\/23\/2015-TPL dated 29th September, 2016 by which the ICDS were notified under section 145(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"journal2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-circular-clarifies-important-aspects-of-icds-faqs\/\">Click here to read\/ download CBDT&#8217;s Circular No. 10 of 2017 dated 23.03.2017 by which it has provided important clarifications on the Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) in the form of FAQs<\/a> <\/div>\n<div class=\"journal3\">Reproduced with permission from the AIFTP Journal <\/div>\n<table width=\"100%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFCC\">\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Disclaimer: <\/strong>The  contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not  constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has  been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions  herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its  affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising  out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any  actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be  distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without  express written permission of itatonline.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There have been a spate of amendments to the various Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) prescribed by the Central Government under section 145 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. CA Dhaval Desai has systematically analyzed all the ICDS issued up to date and explained their implications in a concise manner<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/income-computation-and-disclosure-standards-icds-an-update\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[10,14,15,16],"class_list":["post-3893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles","tag-10","tag-icds","tag-income-computation-and-disclosure-standards","tag-section-145-2-of-the-income-tax-act"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}