{"id":4931,"date":"2018-02-05T10:33:08","date_gmt":"2018-02-05T05:03:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/?p=4931"},"modified":"2018-02-05T10:33:08","modified_gmt":"2018-02-05T05:03:08","slug":"finance-bill-2018-salary-drafting-mistakes-reasonably-higher-deduction-is-desirable","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/finance-bill-2018-salary-drafting-mistakes-reasonably-higher-deduction-is-desirable\/","title":{"rendered":"Finance Bill 2018 &#8211; Salary &#8211; Drafting Mistakes &#8211; Reasonably Higher Deduction Is Desirable"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/CA-DEV-KUMAR-KOTHARI.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"100\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-3890\" \/><\/p>\n<p>CA Dev Kumar Kothari has argued that there is a drafting mistake in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/download-finance-bill-2018\/\">Finance Bill 2018<\/a> relating to the grant of standard deduction. He has explained what that mistake is and offered suggestions on how it can be rectified<\/p>\n<p>There appears a drafting mistake in proposed clauses and  notes vis a vis speech of FM and explanatory notes on clause no. 7 and 8 of the  FB. Higher deduction linked with salary amount is desirable. <\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Existing provisions: <\/p>\n<p>Before reading proposed clauses let us have  a look on the existing relevant provision, as referred to in clauses and notes  which are&nbsp; necessary to consider effect  of&nbsp; amendment. Relevant portion of S.17  in so far relevant to reading and linking proposed clauses are&nbsp; reproduced below:<\/p>\n<p><strong>&quot;Salary&quot;,  &quot;perquisite&quot; and &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; defined.<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 17.<\/strong> For the purposes of sections 15 and 16 and of this  section,-<\/p>\n<p>Xxxx <\/p>\n<p>(<em>2<\/em>)  &quot;perquisite&quot; includes-xxx<\/p>\n<p>(viii) the value of any other fringe benefit  or amenity as may be prescribed:<strong>]<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [Provided<\/strong> that nothing in this clause shall apply to,-<\/p>\n<p>(<em>v<\/em>)  any sum paid by the employer in respect of any expenditure actually incurred by  the employee on his medical treatment or treatment of any member of his family <strong>[<\/strong>other than the treat&shy;ment referred  to in clauses (<em>i<\/em>) and (<em>ii<\/em>)<strong>];<\/strong> so, however, that such sum does not exceed fifteen thousand rupees in the  previous year;<\/p>\n<p>Proposal is reproduced below with highlights added: <\/p>\n<p>From the THE FINANCE BILL, 2018 <\/p>\n<p>7.  Amendment of section 16. <\/p>\n<p>In section 16 of the Income-tax Act,  after clause (i) [as omitted by section 6 of the Finance Act, 2005 (18 of  2005)], the following clause shall be inserted with effect from the 1st day of  April, 2019, namely:&ndash;&ndash; <\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;(ia<u>) a deduction of forty thousand  rupees or the amount of the salary, whichever is less;&rdquo;.<\/u><u> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;Notes on clause <\/p>\n<p><em>Clause 7 <\/em>of the Bill seeks to amend section 16 of the  Income-tax Act relating to deductions from salaries. <\/p>\n<p>The existing provisions of the said  section,&nbsp;<em>inter alia<\/em>, provide that the income chargeable under the  head &quot;Salaries&quot; shall be computed after making certain deductions  specified therein.<\/p>\n<p>It is proposed to insert a new clause (<em>ia<\/em>)  in the said section so as to provide for deduction of forty thousand rupees or  the amount of the salary, whichever is less, for the purpose of computing the  income chargeable under the said head.<\/p>\n<p><u>This amendment will take effect from <\/u><u>1st April,   2019<\/u> and will,  accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year 2019-2020 and subsequent  years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>8. Amendment of section 17 <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>In section 17 of the Income-tax Act, in  clause (2), in the proviso occurring after sub-clause (viii), <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">clause (v) shall be omitted<\/span> with effect from the 1st  day of April, 2019.<\/p>\n<p>From notes on clauses:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<em>Clause 8 <\/em>of the Bill seeks to  amend section 17 of the Income-tax Act relating to &quot;Salary&quot;,  &quot;perquisite&quot; and &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; defined. <\/p>\n<p><em><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">Clause&nbsp;<\/em>(<em>v<\/em>)<\/span> of the proviso occurring after sub-clause (<em>viii<\/em>) of clause (<em>2<\/em>)  of the said section provides that any sum paid by the employer in respect of  any <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">expenditure actually incurred by the employee on  his medical treatment or treatment of any member of his family not exceeding  fifteen thousand rupees in the previous year shall not be treated as perquisite  in the hands of the employee.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">It is proposed to omit the said  clause (<em>v<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2019 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the  assessment year 2019-2020 and subsequent years.<\/p>\n<p><strong>From memorandum explaining  proposals:<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Standard deduction on salary income<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Section 16, inter-alia, provides for  certain deduction in computing income chargeable under the head &ldquo;Salaries&rdquo;. it  is proposed to allow a standard deduction upto Rs 40,000\/- or the amount of  salary received, whichever is less. Consequently the&nbsp; <\/strong><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000\">present exemption in respect of Transport Allowance  (except in case of differently abled persons) and reimbursement of medical  expenses is proposed to be withdrawn.<\/span><\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>These amendments will take effect  from <\/strong><strong>1st April, 2019<\/strong><strong> and will, accordingly, apply in  relation to the assessment year 2019-20 and subsequent assessment years.  [Clause 7 &amp; 8]<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>From budget speech of the FM:<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Relief  to salaried taxpayers<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>151. The Government had made many  positive changes in the personal income-tax rate applicable to individuals in  the last three years. Therefore, I do not propose to make any further change in  the structure of the income tax rates for individuals. There is a general perception in the  society that individual business persons have better income as compared to  salaried class. However, income tax data analysis suggests that major portion  of personal income-tax collection comes from the salaried class. For assessment  year 2016-17, 1.89 crore salaried individuals have filed their returns and have  paid total tax of Rs 1.44 lakh crores which works out to  average tax payment of &nbsp;Rs 76,306\/- per individual salaried taxpayer. As  against this, 1.88 crores individual business taxpayers including  professionals, who filed their returns for the same assessment year paid total  tax of &nbsp;Rs 48,000 crores which works out to an average tax payment of  &nbsp;Rs 25,753\/- per individual business taxpayer. In order to provide relief  to salaried taxpayers, <span style=\"color: #ff0000\">I propose to allow a standard deduction of &nbsp;Rs 40,000\/- in  lieu of the present exemption in respect of transport allowance and  reimbursement of miscellaneous medical expenses.<\/span> However, the transport allowance at enhanced rate  shall continue to be available to differently- abled persons. Also other  medical reimbursement benefits in case of hospitalization etc., for all  employees shall continue. Apart from reducing paper work and compliance, this  will help middle class employees even more in terms of reduction in their tax  liability. This decision to allow standard deduction shall significantly  benefit the pensioners also, who normally do not enjoy any allowance on account  of transport and medical expenses. The revenue cost of this decision is  approximately &nbsp;Rs 8,000 crores. The total number of salaried employees and  pensioners who will benefit from this decision is around 2.5 crores. <\/p>\n<p>Unquote: <\/p>\n<p>Apparent anomaly: <\/p>\n<p>As per Clause 8 of the FB, that is as per proposed  amendment clause (v) of proviso (exempted perquisites) &nbsp;is to be omitted. This clause relates to only  medical reimbursement up to Rs.15000\/-. The notes on clauses also says about  omission of this clause only. <\/p>\n<p>Therefore, there seems some drafting error in  proposed clauses in the FB vis a vis the Speech and Memorandum. <\/p>\n<p>What is given by one hand is taken back by other  hand: <\/p>\n<p>Earlier a  deduction under section 16 (i) of the I.T.Act, which was popularly called as  standard deduction was allowed against salary income. However, same was phased  out and from assessment year 2006-07 no such deduction is allowed. <\/p>\n<p>Earlier deduction of Rs.30000 was allowed. FM has  proposed Rs.40000 ignoring the fact that during &nbsp;last ten&nbsp;  years inflation as well as salaries have gone up by 250 to 500 per cent,  just on consideration of seniority and ignoring efficiency and productivity, as  generally happen in government departments.. <\/p>\n<p>If transport allowance and medical reimbursement  both are withdrawn then there will be hardly further deduction of about Rs.  seven to ten thousand only for any of employee. This is very small deduction. <\/p>\n<p><strong>We find standard deduction  proposed is in very simple term. As per proposal irrespective of amount of  taxable salary the assessee will be entitled to get a deduction of Rs.40,000 or  taxable salary whichever is less.&nbsp; Thus  suppose if a person has worked for few days or months and his salary is just  40,000 for a previous year, then he will be entitled to deduction equal to  salary being the same amount. If his salary is less say Rs.30,000 the deduction  shall be restricted to&nbsp; Rs.30,000. If  salary exceed amount of Rs.40,000, the deduction shall be restricted to  Rs.40,000.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Standard deduction should be  linked to amount of salary because with increase in salary, expenses in  connection with employment also increases. Therefore, a provision can be made  to allow deduction equal to 10% of salary subject to maximum of Rs.200000. <\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"103%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFCC\">\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Disclaimer: <\/strong>The  contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not  constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has  been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions  herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its  affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising  out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any  actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be  distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without  express written permission of itatonline.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CA Dev Kumar Kothari has argued that there is a drafting mistake in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/download-finance-bill-2018\/\">Finance Bill 2018<\/a> relating to the grant of standard deduction. He has explained what that mistake is and offered suggestions on how it can be rectified<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/finance-bill-2018-salary-drafting-mistakes-reasonably-higher-deduction-is-desirable\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}