{"id":6277,"date":"2019-10-09T10:08:12","date_gmt":"2019-10-09T04:38:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/?p=6277"},"modified":"2019-10-09T10:08:12","modified_gmt":"2019-10-09T04:38:12","slug":"unabsorbed-depreciation-u-s-32-of-income-tax-act-benefit-without-limits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/unabsorbed-depreciation-u-s-32-of-income-tax-act-benefit-without-limits\/","title":{"rendered":"Unabsorbed  Depreciation U\/s 32 Of Income-Tax Act &#8211; Benefit Without Limits"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>CA Pratik Sandbhor has dealt with the important questions (i) whether unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against any head of income and (ii) whether unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward in perpetuity. He has answered the questions with reference to the statutory provisions, Circulars issued by the CBDT and the judgements on the point<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>With  the decision of <strong><em>Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court<\/em><\/strong> in case of <strong><em>Tasgaon Taluka SSK&nbsp; Ltd. &ndash; 412 ITR 420 <\/em><\/strong>holding that  Excess Cane Price(<strong>ECP<\/strong>) contains  element of profit distribution and the said profit element embedded in such ECP  shall be disallowed, the SSK&rsquo;s shall be facing huge tax demands. In such  circumstances the SSK&rsquo;s seek some sigh of relief form the set off losses  carried forward over the years to reduce the mounting tax burden. Substantial  portion of such losses includes Unabsorbed Depreciation which has popularity of  being carried forward in perpetuity. But can it be actually carried forward  perpetually and be set off against any head of income.&nbsp; Lets take a further dive to decipher the true  position in respect of the following two issues:-<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>1. Whether  unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against any head of income.<\/p>\n<p>2. Whether unabsorbed depreciation can  be carried forward in perpetuity<\/p>\n<p><strong>Section 32(1)<\/strong> of Income Tax Act 1961  states that in respect of assets (tangible &amp; intangible) the assesse shall  be eligible to claim depreciation at prescribed rates on meeting the following  two conditions:-<\/p>\n<p>i. The  asset is <strong>owned<\/strong> (wholly or partly) by  the assesse<\/p>\n<p>ii. The  assets is <strong>used for purpose of business  &amp; profession<\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>Further Section <strong>32(2)<\/strong> expounds on the terminology of <strong>Unabsorbed Depreciation<\/strong>.&nbsp;  Section 32(2) has not been any indifferent to the amendments that the  Income Tax Act 1961 has seen over the years. The said section has been amended  by <strong>Finance Act 1996<\/strong>&amp;the  amendment by <strong>Finance Act 2001<\/strong>reverting  to original position. <\/p>\n<p>For the sake of brevity lets peruse  the section as it exists today (since A.Y. 2002-03) <\/p>\n<p><em>&ldquo;<strong>32<\/strong><\/em><br \/>\n    <strong><em>(1)&hellip;&hellip;.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>(2)<\/em><\/strong><em> &nbsp;Where, in the assessment of the assessee, full effect cannot be  given to any allowance under sub-section (1) in any previous year, owing to  there being no profits or gains chargeable for that previous year, or owing to  the profits or gains chargeable being less than the allowance, then, subject to  the provisions of sub-section (2) of&nbsp;<\/em><em>section 72<\/em><em>&nbsp;and sub-section (3) of&nbsp;<\/em><em>section 73<\/em><em>, the allowance or the part of the allowance to which effect has not been  given, as the case may be, <strong>shall be  added to the amount of the allowance for depreciation for the following  previous year and deemed to be part of that allowance, or if there is no such  allowance for that previous year, be deemed to be the allowance for that  previous year,<\/strong> and so on for the succeeding previous years.&rdquo;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On reading through the said section  it can be gleaned that where full effect cannot be given to depreciation as  computed u\/s 32(1), in any previous year, owing to fact that the depreciation  allowance for said year exceeds the profit or gains for said previous year then  subject to section 72(2) &amp; 73(3),&nbsp;  the excess of such depreciation shall be added to the depreciation of  following previous year and where there exists no depreciation for following  previous year, such unabsorbed depreciation shall deemed to be the depreciation  for that year. <\/p>\n<p>In other words depreciation of a  particular year just adds up to the depreciation of next year and <strong>attains the form of depreciation of that  particular year<\/strong>. Thus such unutilized depreciation is termed as &lsquo;unabsorbed  depreciation&rsquo; and cannot be said to be a &lsquo;carried forward loss&rsquo;, it stands  distinct.<\/p>\n<p>As far as set off of depreciation is  concerned it is pertinent to note the following points form the section 32(2):- <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Firstly<\/strong><\/span>, the phrase &lsquo;<strong>profits or gains chargeable&rsquo;<\/strong> has a very wide import to include  within its ambit income under all the heads of income . The said phrase does  not constraint to profits or gains of Buinsess or professions only. Refer <strong><em>Virmani  Industries P Ltd &ndash; Supreme Court&nbsp; &#8211; 216  ITR 607.<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Secondly<\/strong><\/span>, the fact that the depreciation  carried forward to following previous year is <strong>deemed to be depreciation of current<\/strong> year puts such unabsorbed  depreciation in the shoes of current year depreciation enabling the set off  such carried forward depreciation against any head of income. <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li><span dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Thirdly<\/strong><\/span>, if the legislature intended to put  any restriction on set off of depreciation against other heads of income as it  did by the amendment of 1996, the said restriction would not have been  withdrawn in its entirety by the amendment of 2001.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Though there exists some <strong>restriction in respect of sequence<\/strong> in  which set off is to be claimed and the same has been worded out in <strong>section72(2),<\/strong> which&nbsp; imposes restriction to extent that, where  there exists carried forward business loss, same shall be set off first before  setting off such unabsorbed depreciation.&nbsp;  Similar restriction is imposed by section <strong>73(2).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Further reference may also be made to  decision of <strong><em>Mumbai ITAT<\/em><\/strong> in the case of <strong><em>Suresh Industries in ITA No. 5374\/Mum\/2011  for A.Y. 2007-08 dated <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>13\/09\/2012<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>Also, the <strong><em>Hon&#8217;ble Bombay High Court<\/em><\/strong> in the case of <strong><em>Parrys (Eastern) P Ltd.<\/em><\/strong><em>&nbsp; &ndash; <strong>384  ITR 264 <\/strong><\/em>held as under<\/p>\n<p><em>&lsquo;short-term&nbsp;capital&nbsp;gain&nbsp;arose on account of sale  of&nbsp;depreciable&nbsp;assets that was held for a period to which  long-term&nbsp;capital&nbsp;gain&nbsp;would apply, said&nbsp;gain&nbsp;would be  set-off against brought forward long-term&nbsp;capital&nbsp;losses  and&nbsp;unabsorbed&nbsp;depreciation&rsquo;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So does this position exist  throughout the subsistence of the Income Tax Act 1961.Well, there&rsquo;s a catch to  it, the amendments by Finance Act 1996 &amp; 2001to the Income Tax Act 1961,as  referred earlier creates a cloudy picture.<\/p>\n<p>As far as the position of section  32(2) prior to the First Amendment i.e. the one in 1996 is concerned, it was  the similar to what we discussed above. The said amendment stretched the  section 32(2) by enumerating certain condition to the effect that:-<\/p>\n<p>a. Carried  forward Unabsorbed Depreciation can be set off only against PGBP<\/p>\n<p>b. Unabsorbed  depreciation can be carried forward for 8 years only form the year for which it  is first computed.<\/p>\n<p>c. And the  unabsorbed depreciation shall be carried forward and sett off only if such  business is continued.<\/p>\n<p>The subsequent <strong>amendment of Finance Act 2001 restored the position<\/strong> as it existed  prior to amendment of 1996 by removing the restrictions<\/p>\n<p>Thus the  position in respect of <strong>depreciation  during and for the period A.Y. 1997-98 to 2001-02 is upset<\/strong> by the said  amendments. The question that arises is that, whether the restrictions imposed  by Finance Act 1996 apply to unabsorbed depreciation brought forward to A.Y.  2002-03 from period <\/p>\n<p>i. Prior to  A.Y. 1997-98<\/p>\n<p>ii. During  A.Y. 1997-98 to A.Y. 2001-02<\/p>\n<p>The <strong><em>Mumbai  Special Bench<\/em><\/strong> in the case of <strong><em>Times Guaranty Limited &ndash; 40 SOT 14<\/em><\/strong> held that the depreciation as on 01\/04\/1997 shall be carried forward only for 8  years and depreciation pertaining to period A.Y. 1997-98 to 2001-02 shall be  carried forward and set off only against PGBP for period of 8 years from the  year in which the depreciation is first computed. <strong>This position has been overruled by various High Court decisions  subsequently.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <strong><em>Gujarat  High Court<\/em><\/strong> in the case of <strong><em>General Motors Ltd. &ndash; 354 ITR 244<\/em><\/strong> took cognizance of the <strong>CBDT Circular No.  14 of 2001<\/strong> and held as under <\/p>\n<p><em>The CBDT Circular  clarifies the intent of the amendment that it is for enabling the industry to  conserve sufficient funds to replace plant and machinery and accordingly the  amendment dispenses with the restriction of 8 years for carry forward and set  off of unabsorbed depreciation. The amendment is applicable from assessment  year 2002-03 and subsequent years. <strong>This  means that any unabsorbed depreciation available to an assessee on 1st day of  April, 2002 (A.Y. 2002-03) will be dealt with in accordance with the provisions  of section 32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001 and not by the provisions of  section 32(2) as it stood before the said amendment.<\/strong> Had the intention of  the Legislature been to allow the unabsorbed depreciation allowance worked out  in A.Y. 1997-98 only for eight subsequent assessment years even after the  amendment of section 32(2) by Finance Act, 2001 it would have incorporated a  provision to that effect. However, it does not contain any such provision.  Hence keeping in view the purpose of amendment of section 32(2) of the Act, a  purposive and harmonious interpretation has to be taken<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The  said decision has been further followed by <strong><em>Hon&#8217;ble Bombay High Court<\/em><\/strong> in the  case of <strong><em>Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. &ndash; 394 ITR 73<\/em><\/strong>. And the <strong>SLP<\/strong> against the same has been <strong><em>dismissed by Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court in 261  Taxman 558 (2019)<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Therefore  it may be summarized to say that the unabsorbed depreciation standing as on 01\/04\/2002 shall  be eligible to be carried forward perpetually and set off against any head of  income. <\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Conclusion:-<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>For  the sake of brevity and easy perusal the position in respect of unabsorbed  depreciation could be summarized and tabulated as follows:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1029\" height=\"254\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1.png 1029w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-300x74.png 300w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-768x190.png 768w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-1024x253.png 1024w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-100x25.png 100w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-150x37.png 150w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-200x49.png 200w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-450x111.png 450w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-600x148.png 600w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-1-900x222.png 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1029px) 100vw, 1029px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1031\" height=\"532\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-6281\" srcset=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2.png 1031w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-300x155.png 300w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-768x396.png 768w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-1024x528.png 1024w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-100x52.png 100w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-150x77.png 150w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-200x103.png 200w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-450x232.png 450w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-600x310.png 600w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-2-900x464.png 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1031px) 100vw, 1031px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1044\" height=\"509\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-6280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3.png 1044w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-300x146.png 300w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-768x374.png 768w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-1024x499.png 1024w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-100x49.png 100w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-150x73.png 150w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-200x98.png 200w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-450x219.png 450w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-600x293.png 600w, https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/depreciation-3-900x439.png 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1044px) 100vw, 1044px\" \/><\/p>\n<table width=\"103%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFCC\">\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Disclaimer: <\/strong>The  contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not  constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has  been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions  herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its  affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising  out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any  actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be  distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without  express written permission of itatonline.org<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CA Pratik Sandbhor has dealt with the important questions (i) whether unabsorbed depreciation can be set off against any head of income and (ii) whether unabsorbed depreciation can be carried forward in perpetuity. He has answered the questions with reference to the statutory provisions, Circulars issued by the CBDT and the judgements on the point<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/unabsorbed-depreciation-u-s-32-of-income-tax-act-benefit-without-limits\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}