{"id":647,"date":"2010-12-03T18:01:40","date_gmt":"2010-12-03T18:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/?p=647"},"modified":"2010-12-03T18:05:40","modified_gmt":"2010-12-03T18:05:40","slug":"dtc-bill-2010-anomalies-in-charities-law-suggestions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/dtc-bill-2010-anomalies-in-charities-law-suggestions\/","title":{"rendered":"DTC Bill 2010: Anomalies in Charities Law &#038; Suggestions"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"articleblogheader\">\n<div class=\"articlepicture2\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/m_a_bakshi.jpg\" alt=\"Shri. M. A. Bakshi\" width=\"98\" height=\"100\" \/><\/div>\n<p> DTC Bill 2010: Anomalies in Charities Law &#038; Suggestions <\/p>\n<p>    Shri M. A. Bakshi, Vice President (Retd), ITAT <\/p>\n<p>               The author, using his vast experience as Lawyer &#038; Judge, has not only meticulously &#038; critically examined the provisions of the Direct Tax Code Bill relating to charities and identified several anomalies and loopholes therein, but also made several valuable suggestions on how the law should be amended to make it just &#038; effective.\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"chandrika\">\n<p>    <strong>Suggestion No. 1:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong><u>Charitable trust\/institutions  carrying out &ldquo;any other object of public utility&rdquo; not to carry on any business  etc.<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  It would be relevant to mention that under the Income Tax  Act, 1961 following are the broad principles of law relating to taxation of  charitable\/religious trusts\/institutions:<\/p>\n<p>  Income  derived from the property held under Trust wholly for charitable or religious  purposes is exempt from taxation subject to fulfillment of certain conditions  laid down under the Act. The relevant provisions are contained in Section 11 to  13. Section 2 (15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is also relevant as it defines&rdquo;  charitable purposes.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><!--more--> <\/p>\n<div class=\"chandrika\">\n<div align=\"center\">\n<div class=\"\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"articlequote\">\n<p>The proposed provisions of section 102 in the DTC Bill 2010 read with section 103(vi) has the potential of denying the benefit of exemption to charitable trusts\/institutions even in respect of charitable activities not involving any business when some activity in the form business is also carried out by such organizations The NPO should not lose exemption if one activity of an NPO is not deemed to be Charitable activity but the income from the said activity should be taxed at maximum marginal rate\n  <\/p><\/div>\n<p>  Under the  Income-tax Act 1961 before 1st April 1984 the term charitable  purpose was defined to include:-<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n  <strong>(i) relief  of the poor,<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>(ii) education, <\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(iii) medical relief; and<\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(iv) advancement  of any other object of general public utility not involving the carrying on of  any activity for profit.<\/strong>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>However,  with effect from 1st April 1984 the words &ldquo;not involving the  carrying on of any activity for profit&rdquo; were omitted.<\/p>\n<p>  With  effect from 1st April 2009 the following objects were added to the  definition of charitable purposes :- <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n <strong>(v) preservation  of environment (including water sheds, forests and wild life) and<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(vi) Preservation  of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic significance.<\/strong>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By the Finance Act 2008 a proviso has been added to Section  2(15) to provide that if advancement of any other object of general public  utility involves carrying on any activity in the nature of business or any  activity of rendering any services in relation to any business for a  consideration, it shall cease to be a charitable purpose.<\/p>\n<p>  From Assessment Year 2009-2010 second proviso has been added  to Section 2 (15) of the Act to the effect that first proviso will not apply if  the aggregate value of the receipts from the activities referred to in the  first proviso is Rs.10 lacs or less in the previous year.<\/p>\n<p>  Under  the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 the above stated position of law is sought to  be retained. However, section 103 of the DTC Bill 2010 in its present form does  not produce the desired result of simplification of law. In order to appreciate  our submissions it will be useful to compare the relevant provisions in its  present form with the provisions proposed under the Direct Tax Code 2010.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<table width=\"90%\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<tr>\n<td width=\"305\">\n<p align=\"center\"><u>PROVISION UNDER    INCOME TAX ACT 1961<\/u><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"309\">\n<p align=\"center\"><u>CORRESPONDING PROVISION UNDER    THE DIRECT TAX CODE BILL 2010<\/u> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"305\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><u>Section 2(15) if the Income-tax Act 1961:-<\/u><u> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>      2(15)&ldquo;charitable purpose&rdquo; includes relief of the poor, education,    medical relief, <strong>[<\/strong>preservation of environment (including    watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments or places or    objects of artistic or historic interest,<strong>]<\/strong> and the advancement of any other object of    general public utility: <\/p>\n<p>      <strong>Provided<\/strong> that the    advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a    charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the    nature of trade, commerce or business, or any activity of rendering any    service in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess or fee or    any other consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application, or    retention, of the income from such activity; <\/p>\n<p>    Provided further    that the first proviso shall not apply if the aggregate value of the receipts    from the activities referred to therein is ten lakh rupees or less in the    previous year;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"309\" valign=\"top\">\n<p><u>Section    103:-<\/u><u> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>            <strong>103<\/strong>. In this Chapter,    unless the context otherwise requires,&mdash; <\/p>\n<p>      (a)&hellip;&hellip;&hellip;. <\/p>\n<p>      (<em>b<\/em>) &ldquo;Charitable    activity&rdquo; means the following activities carried out in India, <\/p>\n<p>      Namely:&mdash; <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         (i) Relief of the poor;<br \/>\n          (ii) Advancement of education;<br \/>\n        (iii) Medical relief;<br \/>\n          (iv) Preservation of environment  (including watersheds, forests and wildlife);<br \/>\n         (v) preservation of monuments or places or objects of artistic or historic <\/p>\n<p>interest; or <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      (vi) advancement of any other    object of general public utility, not involving the carrying on of any    activity in the nature of trade, commerce or business or any activity of    rendering any service in relation thereto, for a cess, fee or any other    consideration (irrespective of nature of use, application or retention of the    income from such activity) and where the gross receipts during the financial    year from such activity exceed ten lakh rupees;\n    <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p> When we compare the definition of  Charitable purpose under section 2(15) of Income Tax Act 1961 with the  definition of charitable activity under the corresponding provision being  section 103 Clause (vi) of the DTC Bill 2010 it cannot but be said that the  purpose is defeated by the language used in clause (vi) of section 103 of the  DTC Bill 2010. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div align=\"center\">\n<div class=\"\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"articlequoteleft\">\n<p> It is respectfully submitted that such an omission has far reaching consequences for the trusts\/ institutions\/ organizations created before 1st April 1962 which presently continue to enjoy exemption under the Income Tax Act 1961. We are confident that this omission is not deliberate. The organizations created before 1st April 1962 have been granted exemption for the last five decades. There is neither any declaration nor any intention expressed by the government\/legislature for withdrawing the exemption to such organizations. We are confident that the omission is inadvertenant and not deliberate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> In my respectful  submission, language of first and second proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income  Tax Act, 1961 convey the intention of the legislature without any ambiguity in  contrast to the proposed Clause (vi) to Section 103 of the Direct Taxes Code  Bill 2010. It is suggested that Clause (vi) to section 103 of the DTC Bill 2010  may be redrafted as under if earlier suggestion is not accepted.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>103 (vi) Advancement of any other  object of general public utility:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> Provided  that advancement of any other object of general public utility shall not be a  charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the  nature of trade, commerce or business or any activity of rendering any services  in relation to any trade, commerce or business, for a cess and fee or any other  consideration, irrespective of the nature of use or application or retention of  income from such activity;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> provided further that the first proviso shall not apply  to the aggregate value of the receipts from the activities referred to therein  is Rs.10 lacs or less in the previous year.&rdquo;<\/strong><strong><u> <\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n<p>The above suggestion if accepted will  be as per the law that exists now under the Income-tax Act 1961.<\/p>\n<p>    However there is a strong case for reconsideration of the amendment made  in 2009 to section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act 1961 and streamline the  provisions for taxation of profits of business in the case of charitable trusts.  The proposed provisions of section 102 in the DTC Bill 2010 read with section  103(vi) has the potential of denying the benefit of exemption to charitable  trusts\/institutions even in respect of charitable activities not involving any  business when some activity in the form business is also carried out by such  organizations The NPO should not loose exemption if one activity of an NPO is  not deemed to be Charitable activity but the income from the said activity  should be taxed at maximum marginal rate.<\/p>\n<p>  The purpose of taxing the business profits in the  case of such organizations will be achieved if following suggestion is  accepted. <\/p>\n<p>   It is suggested section 103(b)(vi)  of the DTC Bill 2010 may be substituted as under :-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> 103(b)(<em>vi<\/em>) <strong><em>&ldquo;advancement  of any other object of general public utility,<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>  <strong><em>  Provided that where advancement of any object of general public utility  involves the carrying on of any activity  in the nature of trade, commerce or business or any activity of rendering any  service in relation thereto, for a cess, fee or any other  consideration( irrespective of nature of use, application or retention of the  income from such activity), not being an  activity referred to in Sec 93(1)(c), the income from business exceeding  Rupees 10 lakhs shall be taxed at Maximum Marginal Rate.<\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>BESIDES SECTION 102 be amended as under<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong><em><u>Suggested Section 102 of the DTC Bill 2010<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong><em> 102. Notwithstanding  anything contained in chapter IV any person shall be liable to tax at maximum  marginal rate on the specified income for  the relevant assessment year as under :-<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>(1) On the business income even when the  person :-<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>a<\/em><\/strong><strong>) holds any business under trust, notwithstanding  any specific direction that&mdash;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>i<\/em><\/strong><strong>) the business shall form part of the corpus of such  person; or<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>ii<\/em><\/strong><strong>) the income from the business shall be applied only  for charitable<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> activity;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>b<\/em><\/strong><strong>) on the income in respect of which the person fails to comply with the conditions specified  in section 97;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>c<\/em><\/strong><strong>) on the  entire income for the relevant year if it ceases to be a non-profit  organisation at any time during the financial year ,irrespective of  registration granted under sub-section (<\/strong><strong><em>4<\/em><\/strong><strong>) of section 98;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong> (<\/strong><strong><em>d<\/em><\/strong><strong>) on the business income if it is not a business  incidental to charitable activity.<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>(<\/strong><strong><em>2<\/em><\/strong><strong>) Without prejudice  to sub-section (<\/strong><strong><em>1<\/em><\/strong><strong>), the non-profit organisation which ceases to<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><strong>be so due to  conversion, merger or dissolution as referred to in sub-section (<\/strong><strong><em>1<\/em><\/strong><strong>) of section 101  shall be liable to income-tax in respect of its net worth in accordance with  that section.<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>(<\/strong><strong><em>3<\/em><\/strong><strong>) The total income of any  person falling under clauses (<\/strong><strong><em>a<\/em><\/strong><strong>), (<\/strong><strong><em>b<\/em><\/strong><strong>), (<\/strong><strong><em>c<\/em><\/strong><strong>) or clause (<\/strong><strong><em>d<\/em><\/strong><strong>) of sub section 1 shall be computed in  accordance with the provisions of this code <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> <\/strong><strong>The above suggestion is my  respectful submission shall simplify the law and restrict the scope of  litigation<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Suggestion No. 2:- <\/strong> <\/p>\n<p>    <strong>Religious  Trust \/Institutions for the benefit of any particular Religious community  created before 1st April 1962 entitled to exemption under the Income  Tax Act 1961<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  The Income Tax Act 1961 provides for exemption in the case of  charitable as well as religious trust in accordance with the provisions of  Section 11 to 13 read with Section 2 (15). Under Section 13 of the Income Tax  Act 1961, the Trust or Institutions created for the benefit of any particular  religious community or caste are excluded from the benefit of exemption  available under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act 1961. However, the  trusts\/institutions created before the commencement of the Income Tax Act, 1961  have been excluded from the operation of the negative category and are  accordingly entitled to the exemption from taxation under the Income Tax Act  1961<\/p>\n<p>  The DTC Bill 2010 has provided exemption to the religious  trust by including the category in the Seventh Schedule being the list of  entities entitled to exemption from taxation.<\/p>\n<p>   Section 97 of  the DTC Code Bill 2010 corresponds to Section 13 of the Income Tax Act  1961. Under section 97 whereas religious  trust\/institutions created or established for the benefit of any particular  religion or excluded from the benefit of exemption under the DTC Bill 2010 the  exception provided in respect of such trust created or established before 1st  April 1962 allowed under the Income tax Act 1961 has not been mentioned under  Section 97 of the DTC Bill 2010 inadvertenantly. <\/p>\n<p>  Similarly, under the Income Tax Act 1961 Section 13 provides  that if any benefit is provided to the specified persons by the  charitable\/religious trusts\/institutions, such amount of income applied by the  trust\/institution will be taxable. For operation of this provision also certain  exceptions are provided under the said section. Under the DTC Bill 2010 similar  provision is contained in Section 97 read with Section 314 (169), so however  the exception provided under Section 13 of the Income Tax Act 1961is not  provided under Section 97 of the DTC Bill 2010. <\/p>\n<p>  It will be useful to reproduce the relevant portion of  section 13 of the Income-tax Act 1961 and its corresponding provision being  Section 97 of the DTC Bill 2010.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<h2>Section 13 as on 26\/11\/2010 <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>13.Section 11 not to apply in certain cases:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  (1) Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall  operate so as to exclude from the total income of the previous year of the  person in receipt thereof-<\/p>\n<p>  (a) any  part of the income from the property held under a trust for private religious  purposes which does not ensure for the benefit of the public;<\/p>\n<p>  (b) in the  case of a trust for charitable purposes or a charitable institution <strong><u>created or established after the  commencement of this Act,<\/u><\/strong> any income thereof if the trust or  institution is <strong><u>created or established  for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste;<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  (c) in the  case of a trust for charitable or religious purposes or a charitable or  religious institution, any income thereof-<\/p>\n<p>  (i) if  such trust or institution has been <strong><u>created  or established after the commencement of this Act <\/u><\/strong>and under the terms  of the trust or the rules governing the institution, any part of such income  ensures, or<\/p>\n<p>  (ii) if any part of such income or any property of the  trust or the institution (whenever created or established) is during the  previous year used or applied, directly or indirectly for the benefit of any  person referred to in sub-section (3):<\/p>\n<p>  Provided that in the case of a <strong><u>trust or institution created or established before the commencement  of this Act,<\/u><\/strong><u> <\/u>the provisions of sub-clause (ii) shall not apply  to any use or application, whether directly or indirectly, of any part of such  income or any property of the trust or institution for the benefit of any  person referred to in sub-section (3), <strong><u>if  such use or application is by way of compliance with a mandatory term of the  trust or a mandatory rule governing the institution:<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Provided further that in the case of a trust for religious  purposes or a religious institution (whenever created or established) or a  trust for charitable purposes or a <strong><u>charitable  institution created or established before the commencement of this Act,<\/u><\/strong> the provisions of sub-clause (ii) shall not apply to any use or application,  whether directly or indirectly, of any part of such income or any property of  the trust or institution for the benefit of any person referred to in sub-section  (3) in so far as such use or application relates to any period before the 1st  day of June, 1970;<\/p>\n<p>  (d) in the  case of a trust for charitable or religious purposes or a charitable or  religious institution, any income thereof, if for any period during the  previous year-<\/p>\n<p>  (i) any  funds of the trust or institution are invested or deposited after the 28th day  of February, 1983 otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes  specified in sub-section (5) of section 11; or<\/p>\n<p>  (ii) any  funds of the trust or institution invested or deposited before the 1st day of  March, 1983 otherwise than in any one or more of the forms or modes specified  in sub-section (5) of section 11 continue to remain so invested or deposited  after the 30th day of November, 1983; or<\/p>\n<p>  (iii) any  shares in a company, other than&mdash;<\/p>\n<p>  (A) shares in a public sector  company;<\/p>\n<p>  (B) shares  prescribed as a form or mode of investment under clause (xii) of sub-section  (5) of section 11 are held by the trust or institution after the 30th day of  November, 1983:<\/p>\n<p>  Provided that nothing in  this clause shall apply in relation to-<\/p>\n<p>  (i) any  assets held by the trust or institution where such assets form part of the  corpus of the trust or institution as on the 1st day of June, 1973 ;<\/p>\n<p>  (ia) any  accretion to the shares, forming part of the corpus mentioned in clause (i), by  way of bonus shares allotted to the trust or institution;<\/p>\n<p>  (ii) any  assets (being debentures issued by, or on behalf of, any company or  corporation) acquired by the trust or institution before the 1st day of March,  1983;<\/p>\n<p>  (iia) any  asset, not being an investment or deposit in any of the forms or modes  specified in sub-section (5) of section 11, where such asset is not held by the  trust or institution, otherwise than in any of the forms or modes specified in  sub-section (5) of section 11, after the expiry of one year from the end of the  previous year in which such asset is acquired or the 31st day of March, 1993,  whichever is later;<\/p>\n<p>  (iii) any funds  representing the profits and gains of business, being profits and gains of any  previous year relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of  April, 1984 or any subsequent assessment year.<\/p>\n<p>  Explanation.-Where the trust or institution has any other  income in addition to profits and gains of business, the provisions of clause  (iii) of this proviso shall not apply unless the trust or institution maintains  separate books of account in respect of such business.<\/p>\n<p>  Explanation.-For the purposes of sub-clause (ii) of clause  (c), in determining whether any part of the income or any property of any trust  or institution is during the previous year used or applied, directly or  indirectly, for the benefit of any person referred to in sub-section (3), in so  far as such use or application relates to any period before the 1st day of  July, 1972, no regard shall be had to the amendments made to this section by  section 7 [other than sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) thereof] of the Finance  Act, 1972.<\/p>\n<p>  (2) Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions  of clause (c) and clause (d) of sub-section (1), the income or the property of  the trust or institution or any part of such income or property shall, for the  purposes of that clause, be deemed to have been used or applied for the benefit  of a person referred to in sub-section (3),-<\/p>\n<p>  (a) if any part of the income or property of the trust or  institution is, or continues to be, lent to any person referred to in  sub-section (3) for any period during the previous year without either adequate  security or adequate interest or both;<\/p>\n<p>  (b) if any land, building or other property of the trust or  institution is, or continues to be, made available for the use of any person  referred to in sub-section (3), for any period during the previous year without  charging adequate rent or other compensation;<\/p>\n<p>  (c) if any amount is paid by way of salary, allowance or  otherwise during the previous year to any person referred to in sub-section (3)  out of the resources of the trust or institution for services rendered by that  person to such trust or institution and the amount so paid is in excess of what  may be reasonably paid for such services;<\/p>\n<p>  (d) if the services of the trust or institution are made  available to any person referred to in sub-section (3) during the previous year  without adequate remuneration or other compensation;<\/p>\n<p>  (e) if any share, security or other property is purchased  by or on behalf of the trust or institution from any person referred to in  sub-section (3) during the previous year for consideration which is more than  adequate;<\/p>\n<p>  (f) if any share, security or other property is sold by or  on behalf of the trust or institution to any person referred to in sub-section  (3) during the previous year for consideration which is less than adequate;<\/p>\n<p>  (g) if any  income or property of the trust or institution is diverted during the previous  year in favour of any person referred to in sub-section(3):<\/p>\n<p>  Provided  that this clause shall not apply where the income, or the value of the property  or, as the case may be, the aggregate of the income and the value of the  property, so diverted does not exceed one thousand rupees;<\/p>\n<p>  (h) if any funds of the trust or institution are, or  continue to remain, invested for any period during the previous year (not being  a period before the 1st day of January, 1971), in any concern in which any  person referred to in sub-section (3) has a substantial interest.<\/p>\n<p>  (3) The persons referred to in clause (c) of sub-section  (1) and sub-section (2) are the following, namely:-<\/p>\n<p>  (a) the author of the trust or the founder of the  institution;<\/p>\n<p>  (b) any person who has made a substantial contribution to  the trust or institution, that is to say, any person whose total contribution  up to the end of the relevant previous year exceeds fifty thousand rupees;<\/p>\n<p>  (c) where such author, founder or person is a Hindu  undivided family, a member of the family;<\/p>\n<p>  (cc) any trustee of the trust or manager (by whatever name  called) of the institution;<\/p>\n<p>  (d) any relative of any such author, founder, person ,  member, trustee or manager as aforesaid;<\/p>\n<p>  (e) any concern in which any of the persons referred to in  clauses (a), (b), (c), (cc) and (d) has a substantial interest.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(4)  Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (c) of sub-section (1) but without  prejudice to the provisions contained in clause (d) of that sub-section, in a  case where the aggregate of the funds of the trust or institution invested in a  concern in which any person referred to in sub-section (3) has a substantial  interest, does not exceed five per cent. of the capital of that concern, the  exemption under section 11 or section 12 shall not be denied in relation to any  income other than the income arising to the trust or the institution from such  investment, by reason only that the funds of the trust or the institution have  been invested in a concern in which such person has a substantial interest.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  (5) Notwithstanding anything contained in clause (d) of  sub-section (1), where any assets (being debentures issued by, or on behalf of,  any company or corporation) are acquired by the trust or institution after the  28th day of February, 1983 but before the 25th day of July, 1991, the exemption  under section 11 or section 12 shall not be denied in relation to any income  other than the income arising to the trust or the institution from such assets,  by reason only that the funds of the trust or the institution have been  invested in such assets if such funds do not continue to remain so invested in  such assets after the 31st day of March, 1992.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(6)  Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), but  without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section (2) of section 12,  in the case of a charitable or religious trust running an educational  institution or a medical institution or a hospital, the exemption under section  11 or section 12 shall not be denied in relation to any income, other than the  income referred to in sub-section (2) of section 12, by reason only that such  trust has provided educational or medical facilities to persons referred to in  clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c) or clause (cc) or clause (d) of  sub-section (3).<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  <strong><u>CORRESPONDING PROVISIONS UNDER THE  DIRECT TAX CODE BILL 2010<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Under  the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 the charitable\/religious trusts\/institutions  have been classified in the category of Non-Profit Organizations. The  provisions of Section 90 to 103 read with Section 314(169) relate to the  taxability of non-profit organizations. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <strong>Section 314 (169) of the Direct  Taxes Code Bill 2010 defines non-profit organization as under:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>314(<\/strong><strong><em>169<\/em><\/strong><strong>)<\/strong> &ldquo;non-profit organisation&rdquo; means an  organisation, by whatever name called, including a trust, if&mdash; <\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(<\/strong><strong><em>i<\/em><\/strong><strong>)  it is not established for the benefit of any particular caste or religious  community;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(<\/strong><strong><em>ii<\/em><\/strong><strong>)  it does not provide any benefit for the members of any particular caste or  religious community;<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  (<em>iii<\/em>) it is established for the benefit of the general public or for  the benefit of the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, backward classes,  women or children; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>iv<\/em>) it is established for carrying on charitable activities; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>v<\/em>) it is not established for the benefit of any of its members; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>vi<\/em>) it actually carries on the charitable activities during the  financial year; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>vii<\/em>) the actual beneficiaries of its activities are the general  public, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, backward classes, or women  or children; and <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>viii<\/em>) it is registered as such under section 98; <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Section 97 of the DTC Bill 2010 is also relevant and accordingly  reproduced here under:-<\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <strong>97. <\/strong>(<em>1<\/em>) The funds or the assets of the non-profit organisation shall  not be used or applied, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of an  interested person. <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>2<\/em>) Without prejudice to sub-section (<em>1<\/em>), the funds or the assets of the non-profit organisation shall  be deemed to have been used or applied for the benefit of an interested person,  if&mdash; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>a<\/em>) the funds or the assets of the non-profit organisation are, or  continue to be, lent to any interested person, for any period during the  financial year, without either adequate security or adequate interest or both; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>b<\/em>) the land, building or other asset of the non-profit  organisation is, or continues to be, made available for the use of any  interested person, for any period during the financial year, without charging  adequate rent or other compensation; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>c<\/em>) any amount is paid by way of salary, allowance or otherwise  during the financial year to any interested person, out of the resources of the  non-profit organisation for services rendered by that person to such  organisation and the amount so paid is in excess of what may be reasonably paid  for such services; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>d<\/em>) the services of the non-profit organisation are made available  to any interested person, during the financial year, without adequate  remuneration or other compensation; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>e<\/em>) any share, security or other property is purchased by or on  behalf of the non-profit organisation from any interested person, during the  financial year, for consideration which is more than adequate; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>f<\/em>) any share, security or other property is sold by or on behalf  of the non-profit organisation to any interested person, during the financial  year, for consideration which is less than adequate; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>g<\/em>) any fund or asset of the non-profit organisation is diverted  during the financial year in favour of any interested person where the fund or  the value of the asset, as the case may be, or the aggregate of the funds and  the value of the assets so diverted exceeds one thousand rupees; or <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>h<\/em>) any funds of the non-profit organisation are, or continue to  remain, invested for any period during the financial year (not being a period  before the 1st day of January, 1971), in any concern in which any interested  person has a substantial interest and such investment exceeds five percent of  the capital of that concern. <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>v<\/em>)  any relative of the settler, founder, member, trustee or manager; or <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>vi<\/em>) any concern in which any of the persons referred to in clauses  (<em>i<\/em>) to (<em>v<\/em>)  has a substantial interest; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>e<\/em>) &ldquo;trust&rdquo; includes legal obligation <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  <strong>It is  evident from Section 13 of the Income Tax Act 1961 that the benefit of  exemption under Section 11 is not available to any trust\/ institution created  for any particular religious community except those which were created or  established before 1st April 1962. This law is sought to be retained  under the DTC Bill 2010. So however, a perusal of Section 13 of the Income-tax  Act 1961 and the corresponding provisions namely Section 314 (169) read with  Section 97 of the DTC Bill 2010 relating to charitable\/ religious  trusts\/institutions, it is observed that the benefit available to the  organizations created for the benefit of any particular religious community  established before the commencing of the Income Tax Act 1961 i.e. before 1st  April 1962 has been omitted inadvertently.<\/strong> <strong>It is respectfully submitted that such an omission has far reaching  consequences for the trusts\/institutions\/organizations created before 1st  April 1962 which presently continue to enjoy exemption under the Income Tax Act  1961. We are confident that this  omission is not deliberate. The organizations created before 1st  April 1962 have been granted exemption for the last five decades. There is  neither any declaration nor any intention expressed by the government\/legislature  for withdrawing the exemption to such organizations. We are confident that the  omission is inadvertenant and not deliberate. It is therefore suggested that  the following changes may be made in the DTC Bill 2010 to make the law it in  accord with the law in respect of such organizations created\/established for  the benefit of any particular religious community before 1st April  1962 <\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Section  314(169) may be modified as under:-<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>&ldquo;314(169)<\/strong>: Non-Profit Organizations: means an  organization by whatever name called including a Trust if<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>  (i) It is not established for the benefit of any  particular caste or religious community.<br \/>\n  (ii) It does not provide any benefit for the members  of any particular caste or religious community.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong><u>(proviso may be added after  sub-clause (i) and (ii) Section 314 (169) to read as under)<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>(Provided clause (i) and (ii) above shall not apply to  such trust\/institutions\/organizations created\/established before 1st  April 1962)<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>   It is further  suggested that following clause 41 may be added to the Seventh Schedule to DTC  Bill 2010. <\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Proposed Clause 41 in Seventh  Schedule<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <strong>&ldquo;41: Any religious trust\/ institution\/organization  by whatever name called established before 1st April 1962 for the  benefit of any religious community\/caste.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion No. 3:-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  It is further pointed out that, Section 13 of the Income Tax  Act 1961 prohibits application of any funds or assets directly or indirectly  for the benefit of any interested person. So however exception is provided in  the case of organizations created before 1st April 1962 if such use  or application is by way of compliance with the mandatory term of the trust or  a mandatory rule governing the institution.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    Under the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 there is  no corresponding provision in this regard. <\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Clause 39(g) of Seventh Schedule of  the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 reads as under:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  &ldquo;These  funds or assets are not used or applied or deemed to have been used or applied,  directly or indirectly, for the benefit of any interested person.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<p>  It  is suggested that in order to bring the law in accord with the existing law,  following proviso may be added to entry 39(g) of the Seventh Schedule.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>Entry 39(g) &ldquo;These funds or assets  are not used or applied or deemed to have been used or applied, directly or  indirectly for the benefit of any interested person.&rdquo; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Provided that in case of a  trust\/institution created or established prior to 1st April 1962,  the provisions of Entry 39(g) of the Seventh Schedule of Direct Taxes Code Bill  2010 shall not apply if such funds or assets are used or applied directly or  indirectly for any interested person if such use or application is by way of  compliance with the mandatory permission of the Trust or a mandatory rule  governing the organization.&rdquo;<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  It is further suggested that the other exceptions provided  under Section 13 of the Income Tax Act 1961 may be adopted in Section 97 of the  Direct Tax Code 2010.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion  No. 4:-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  As mentioned earlier, religious trusts are included in the  list of entities not liable to tax and entry no. 39 of Seventh Schedule  provides for exemption in the case of public religious trusts or institutions  subject to certain conditions contained therein. One of the conditions is that  such a trust is registered under Section 98 of the Code. <\/p>\n<p>  It  is pertinent to mentioned that Section 98 of the Code provides for registration  of public charitable trusts\/ religious trusts. However the trust\/institutions  as are already registered under the provisions of Income Tax Act 1961 are not  required to apply for registration under  the said Section. The relevant Section 98 is reproduced here under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>&ldquo;98: <\/strong>(1) A non-profit organisation shall make an  application for its registration in the prescribed form and manner to the  Commissioner. <\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(<\/strong><strong>2<\/strong><strong>) The provisions of sub-section (<\/strong><strong><em>1<\/em><\/strong><strong>) shall not apply to any non-profit  organization which has been granted approval or registration under the Income  Tax Act 1961 as it stood before the commencement of this Code, if the  organisation fulfils such conditions as may be prescribed<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>  (3)The Commissioner, on receipt of the  application for registration of a non-profit organisation made under  sub-section (<em>1<\/em>), shall call for such documents or  information as he <\/p>\n<p>  considers  necessary in order to satisfy himself about the objects and genuineness of its  activities and may make such further inquiries as may be required. <\/p>\n<p>  (4) The Commissioner shall, within a period of  six months from the end of the month in which the application under sub-section  (<em>1<\/em>) was received, pass an order in writing&mdash; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>a<\/em>) registering the non-profit organisation if he is satisfied  about its objects and the genuineness of its activities; or <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>b<\/em>) refusing to register the non-profit organisation if he is not  so satisfied, after giving the organisation an opportunity of being heard. <\/p>\n<p>  (5) The registration granted under sub-section (<em>4<\/em>) shall be valid from the financial year in which the  application under sub-section (<em>1<\/em>)  was made. <\/p>\n<p>  (6) Where the Commissioner is satisfied that the  activities of the non-profit organisation are&mdash; <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>i<\/em>) not genuine; or <\/p>\n<p>  (<em>ii<\/em>) not being carried out in accordance with its objects; or <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> not being carried out in accordance with any other law which is  applicable to it or under which it is registered or approved, he shall pass an  order in writing cancelling the registration or withdrawing the approval, as  the case may be, granted under this section or the Income tax Act, 1961, as it  stood before the commencement of this Code, after giving the organisation an  opportunity of being heard.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> As  submitted earlier one of the conditions for eligibility of trust\/institutions  for exemption under entry 39 of Seventh Schedule to DTC Bill 2010 is&rdquo; that the  religious trust\/institutions is registered under Section 98 of the Code&rdquo;. Since  the trust\/institutions which are already registered under the Income Tax Act  1961 are not required to apply for registration under the DTC Bill 2010 a doubt  will arise as to whether such trust\/institutions can said to be registered  under the DTC Bill 2010.<\/p>\n<p>    We are confident that the intention of the  legislature is not to deprive the exemption to such trusts or institutions  which are registered under the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961. It is  therefore suggested that Clause 39 (a) of Seventh Schedule to Direct Taxes Code  Bill 2010 may be modified as under:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>It is  registered under Section 98 of this Code or under Section 12 (AA) of the Income  Tax Act, 1961.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Suggestion No. 4A:-<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>   Similarly,  Section 79 of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 provides for deduction to the  persons making donations to the specified trust\/institutions as are approved  under Section 98 of the DTC Bill 2010. Part IV of the Sixteenth Schedule  provides for deduction in respect of certain trusts\/institutions\/organizations  @ 50%. <\/p>\n<p>  Item  6 of part 4 reads as under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <u>Schedule Sixteenth<\/u><\/p>\n<p>  <u>Donations eligible for 50% deduction.<\/u><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(6)<\/strong> Any other  funds or any institution or any organization which is approved under Section  98.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>   As  pointed out earlier, Section 98 provides that any organization which has been  granted approval or registration under the Income Tax Act 1961 as it stood  before the commencing of the code will not be required to make an application  for registration or approval.<\/p>\n<p>  If  technical view is strictly taken, any organization which is registered or  approved under the Income Tax Act 1961 would not be an organization approved or  registered under the DTC Bill 2010. A genuine doubt in the mind of the tax  administrators as to whether such organization would be eligible for the  benefit of the deduction under Section 79 read with Sixteenth Schedule of the  Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 cannot be ruled out.<\/p>\n<p>   Therefore, it is  humbly suggested that a clarificatory clause may be added to provide the  benefit to such organizations as are presently approved or registered under the  provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is suggested that entry 6 of Part IV  of Sixteenth Schedule to DTC Bill 2010 may be modified as under: <\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Schedule  Sixteenth <\/p>\n<p>  <u>Donations eligible for 50% deduction.<\/u><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(6) Any other funds or any  institution or any organization which is approved under Section 98 or <u>under  Section 80G <\/u>of Income Tax Act 1961<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion No. 5:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Partly religious and partly charitable organizations<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 is silent about such  trusts\/institutions which are partly religious and partly charitable. Reference  may be made to the revised discussion paper issued in June 2010<\/p>\n<p>   chapter V of discussion paper reads as under <\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>(c) Partly religious and partly  charitable institutions will also be treated as NPOs if they are registered  under the Code. Their income from public religious activity will be exempt  subject to the fulfillment of the following conditions. <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(i) The  trust deed\/memorandum of the institution shall contained a clause specifying  the application of its gross receipts in pre determined ratio between  charitable and religious activities<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(ii) It  shall maintained separate books of account and separate financials statements  in respect of religious and charitable activities<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>(iii) It shall fulfill the conditions in clause  (b) above<\/strong>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The  conditions provided in clause (b) of Para 3 of the revised discussion paper is  reproduced here under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>(b)The income of a public religious  institutions will be exempt subject to fulfillment of all the following  conditions:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p> <strong>(A) it  shall be registered under the Code<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(B) the  trust\/institutions shall apply its income wholly for public religious purposes.<\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(C) it  shall be registered under the state law, if any.<\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(D) it  established for the benefit of the general public<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(E) the  trust\/institution shall file the return of tax basis before the due date<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(F) it shall maintain books of account and  obtain an audit report from a qualified accountant, in case its gross receipts  exceed a prescribed limit.<\/strong><br \/>\n <strong>(G) the  funds or the assets of the trust\/institution shall be invested or held, at any  time during the financial year, in specified permitted forms or modes: and <\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(H) the  funds or the assets of the trust\/institution shall not be used or applied or  deemed to have been used or applied, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of  interested persons.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Donations  to these institutions will not be eligible for any deduction in the hands of  the donor. <\/strong><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<p>  It appears that there is inadvertenent omission in the DTC  Bill 2010 relating to partly religious and partly charitable organizations <\/p>\n<p>  It is evident from the said discussion paper that Direct  Taxes Code 2009 circulated in June 2010 contained a provision relating to  partly religious and partly charitable trusts\/institutions. It was provided  that in case the trust deed\/memorandum of the institutions contains a clause  specifying the application of its gross receipts in the pre-determined ratio  between charitable and religious activities the trust would be entitled to  exemption in respect of the income from public religious activities. The income  from charitable activities of the trust would be governed by the provisions as  applicable to NPOs. <\/p>\n<p>  As  stated above there is no mention of such trusts\/institutions in the DTC Bill  2010.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>The  omission in the DTC Bill 2010 in this regard may be rectified by including  provisions relating to partly religious and partly charitable organizations. So  however, the condition relating to the specification of percentage of  respective activities, in the memorandum or trust deed is not practical. It is  suggested that the organizations carrying on their activities partly for  religious and partly for charitable activities should be given an opportunity  before the commissioner of income tax under Section 98 of DTC Bill 2010 to  specify such percentage to be recorded in the registration certificate on the  basis of which exemption\/deduction be allowed. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion No. 6:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Capital expenditure for earning or obtaining any  receipt under Section 93 <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  As pointed out earlier Sections 90 to 103 of Direct Taxes  Code Bill 2010 relate to the computation of income relating to non-profit  organizations. Section 93 of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 gives the items of  &ldquo;gross receipts&rdquo; to be taken into consideration for computation of income of  non-profit organizations.. Section 93(1)(b) provides for inclusion of &ldquo;any rent  received in respect of property held by non-profit organizations consisting of  any building or land appurtenant thereto&rdquo;. Section 94 of the Direct Taxes Code  Bill 2010 gives the list of outgoings for the purpose of computation of total  income of non-profit organizations. Clause (a) of Section 94 provides for a  deduction in respect of the amount paid for any expenditure <strong><u>not being capital expenditure<\/u><\/strong> incurred wholly and exclusively for earning or obtaining any receipt referred  to in Section 93. <\/p>\n<p>  It is evident from the above provisions of Direct Taxes Code Bill  2010 that any expenditure of capital nature incurred by the  trust\/institution or organization incurred wholly or exclusively for earning of  the rental income is not allowed as an outgoing for computation of the income  of the organization.<\/p>\n<p>  The above provision is contrary to the decision of several  High Courts. The decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of <strong>CIT Vs.  Janabhumi Trust<\/strong>, 2000, 242 ITR 457 may be quoted as one of the cases to support  the issue. When the income of the trust is spent for acquisition\/construction  of asset for the purpose of generation of income to be applied for the objects  of the trust. It would be just an reasonable to allow the existing established  law to be continued under the DTC Bill 2010. The income applied for creation of  such an asset justifies to be allowed as application of income for the objects  of the trust. It is therefore humbly submitted that the words &ldquo;not being  capital expenditure&rdquo; may be omitted from Section 94(a) of the Direct Taxes Code  Bill 2010.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion No. 7:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Repayment  of loans as &ldquo; application of income&rdquo;<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Section 93(2) of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 provides  that any loan taken during financial year shall not be included in the &ldquo;gross  receipts&rdquo; of the non-profit organization. This is fully justified. <\/p>\n<p>  Section 94 of DTC 2010 gives the list of outgoings from  &ldquo;gross receipts&rdquo; mentioned under Section 93. It is pertinent to mention that  under the Income Tax Act, 1961 the repayment of loan by any trust\/organization  is considered as application of income for the objects of the trust if the loan  has been used for the objects of the trust\/organization.. Reference may be made  to CBDT Circular No. 100 dated 24th November 1973 which provides  that any loan originally taken to fulfill one of the objects of the trust, will  amount to application of the income for charitable and religious purpose. The  decision of the Karnataka High Court in case of CIT Vs. Janabhumi Trust, 2000,  242 ITR 457 and several other decisions support the view.<\/p>\n<p>  It is suggested that in order to avoid any litigation a  clause may be added in Section 94 in Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 to provide for  deduction in respect of any repayment of loan originally taken to fulfill any  one objects of the trust. In case the suggestion is accepted, it would be  reasonable to also include a provision to the effect that deduction in respect  of the expenditure incurred out of the loans will not be considered as  application of income for the objects of the trust until the amount is repaid.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion No. 8:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Period of accumulation\/setting apart be increased<\/u><\/strong><strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>   Under  Section 94(f) of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010, deduction is provided for any  amount accumulated or set apart for carrying on any charitable activities to  the extent of 15% of the total income or 10% of the gross receipts whichever is  higher if such amount is invested or deposited in the mode specified under  Section 95 for a period not exceeding 3 years from the end of the financial  year.<\/p>\n<p>  It is submitted that under the Income Tax Act 1961 a period  for accumulation or setting apart earlier was 10 years which was reduced to 5  years. It is respectfully submitted that there is no justification for reducing  the period for accumulation or setting apart of income. It is submitted that  the period of accumulation may be restored to 10 years and in any case may not be  less than 5 years as presently available under the Income Tax Act 1961.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>Suggestion No. 9 the:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong><u>Deduction of administrative expenses\/depreciation on  assets.<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Section 94 of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 provides for  deduction in respect of the outgoings in the case of non-profit organizations.  Clause (a) of Section 94 provides&rdquo; the amount paid for any expenditure incurred  wholly and exclusively for earning or obtaining any receipts referred to in  Section 93&rdquo; as an outgoing. It is suggested that in order to simplify the law  and to avoid ligation, it may be specifically provided that the administrative  expenses including depreciation on the fixed assets would be allowed as an  outgoing. It is therefore suggested that clause (a) of 94 may be modified as  under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>&ldquo;94.<\/strong> The amount  of outgoings during the financial year for the purpose of computation of the  total income shall be the aggregate of:-<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(a) the amount paid for any  expenditure including administrative expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively  for earning or obtaining any receipts referred to in Section 93<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>(a)i.  depreciation on asset in respect of which no deduction is claimed under any  other provisions of the Code. <\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>  It may be pertinent to mention that there is no scope for  double deduction in respect of depreciation as there are safeguards already  provided under the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 prohibiting double deduction.  Please refer to Sections 18(c), 18(2), 36(3), 38(4)(b) and 44(7).<\/p>\n<p>  The  suggestion is made in order to make the law simple to understand and avoid  litigation.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion  No. 11:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Benefit for investment out of capital gains<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  Section 93(d) of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 provides for  inclusion of capital gains in the gross receipts of any non-profit organization.  Whereas there can be no objection to the inclusion of capital gains in the  gross receipts the denial of benefit allowed under Section 11(1A) of the Income  Tax Act 1961 is not justified.. It is suggested that the benefit which is  presently available under Section 11(1A) may be retained by adding the relevant  clause of Section 11(1A) in this regard as a proviso to Clause (d) of Section  93 of DTC Bill 2010.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> <strong>Provided that &#8211; <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>For the purposes of sub-section  (1),&mdash;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>a<\/em>) where a capital asset, being property held  under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes, is transferred and the  whole or any part of the net consideration is utilised for acquiring another  capital asset to be so held, then, the capital gain arising from the transfer  shall be deemed to have been applied to charitable or religious purposes to the  extent specified hereunder, namely:&mdash;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>i<\/em>) where the whole of the net consideration is  utilised in acquiring the new capital asset, the whole of such capital gain ;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>ii<\/em>) where only a part of the net consideration is  utilised for acquiring the new capital asset, so much of such capital gain as  is equal to the amount, if any, by which the amount so utilised exceeds the  cost of the transferred asset;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>b<\/em>) where a capital asset, being property held  under trust in part only for such purposes, is transferred and the whole or any  part of the net consideration is utilised for acquiring another capital asset  to be so held, then, the appropriate fraction of the capital gain arising from  the transfer shall be deemed to have been applied to charitable or religious  purposes to the extent specified hereunder, namely:&mdash;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>i<\/em>) where the whole of the net consideration is  utilised in acquiring the new capital asset, the whole of the appropriate  fraction of such capital gain;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>ii<\/em>) in any other case, so much of the appropriate  fraction of the capital gain as is equal to the amount, if any, by which the  appropriate fraction of the amount utilised for acquiring the new asset exceeds  the appropriate fraction of the cost of the transferred asset.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><em>Explanation.<\/em><\/strong><strong>&mdash;In this sub-section,&mdash;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>i<\/em>) &ldquo;appropriate fraction&rdquo; means the fraction  which represents the extent to which the income derived from the capital asset  transferred was immediately before such transfer applicable to charitable or  religious purposes;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong> (<em>ii<\/em>) &ldquo;cost of the transferred asset&rdquo; means the  aggregate of the cost of acquisition (as ascertained for the purposes of  section 48 and 49) of the capital asset which is the subject of the transfer  and the cost of any improvement thereto within the meaning assigned to that  expression in sub-clause (<em>b<\/em>) of clause (<em>1<\/em>) of section 55;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>&ldquo;net  consideration&rdquo; means the full value of the consideration received or accruing  as a result of the transfer of the capital asset as reduced by any expenditure  incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion  No. 12:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong><u>Benefit of carry forward  of deficit<\/u><\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There is no provision for carry forward of deficit (excess of  expenditure over income) in the case of charitable organizations. It is  suggested that a provision may be made for permitting the excess of expenditure  incurred in any year to be carried forward and set off against the gross  receipts of the subsequent year. <\/p>\n<p>    <strong>Suggestion  No. 13:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>    <strong><u>Organizations carrying on business<\/u><\/strong><u> <\/u><\/p>\n<p>   Section  102 of the Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 excludes the application of beneficial  provision of Chapter IV to any person who holds any business under trust  notwithstanding any specific direction in the instrument of trust etc. that the  business shall form part of the corpus of such organization or the income from  the business shall be applied only for charitable activities. It is  respectfully submitted that this provision is harsh and will create hardship in  genuine cases. It is suggested that such organizations may not be excluded from  the benefits of Chapter IV. So however the income earned from business may be  taxed at maximum marginal rate. This will ensure that there is no loss of  revenue on business income earned by such organizations to the exchequer and at  the same time the benefit under the DTC Bill 2010 is not lost by such  organizations for carrying out charitable\/religious activities.<\/p>\n<p>  <strong>Suggestion  No. 14:- <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><u>Exemption from Wealth Tax <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>  The Direct Taxes Code Bill 2010 provides for the levy of  Wealth Tax on all assesses except non-profit organizations. Since the religious  trusts created before 1st April 1962 have been excluded from the  definition of non-profit organizations, it is suggested that Section 112(1) may  be modified to provide as under:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>&ldquo;Subject to the provisions of this  Code every person other than the persons specified below shall be liable to pay  Wealth Tax on the Net Wealth on the valuation date of the financial year:<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><strong>(i) Non-Profit Organizations as defined under Section  314(169).<\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(ii) Religious Trusts or Institutions.<\/strong><br \/>\n  <strong>(iii) Trusts or Institutions created or established before 1st  April 1962 for the benefit of any religious community\/caste.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The author, using his vast experience as Lawyer &#038; Judge, has not only meticulously &#038; critically examined the provisions of the Direct Tax Code Bill relating to charities and identified several anomalies and loopholes therein, but also made several valuable suggestions on how the law should be amended to make it just &#038; effective<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/dtc-bill-2010-anomalies-in-charities-law-suggestions\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/articles_new\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}