{"id":10790,"date":"2020-03-23T01:23:15","date_gmt":"2020-03-23T01:23:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/seven-stars-v-dcit-2020-421-itr-16-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2020-03-23T01:23:15","modified_gmt":"2020-03-23T01:23:15","slug":"seven-stars-v-dcit-2020-421-itr-16-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/seven-stars-v-dcit-2020-421-itr-16-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Seven Stars v. DCIT (2020) 421 ITR 16 (Bom.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee exported cut and polished diamonds. It also undertook the work of other exporters on contract basis and gave the work of cutting and polishing of diamonds on sub-contract. The assessee claimed deduction under section\u00a080HHC\u00a0of the\u00a0 Act.\u00a0On the receipts on account of reassortment charges and labour commission charges. The AO\u00a0 excluded such amounts for the purpose of deduction under S.80HHC. The CIT (A) allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The Tribunal recorded that the reassortment charges were nothing but commission received by the assessee from the diamond traders when the assessee facilitated the sale of their goods to foreign buyers and that the labour commission was received by the assessee from other diamond dealers for cutting and polishing the diamonds. The Tribunal held that such receipts were not includible in the business profits for the purpose of computation of special deduction under S.80HHC\u00a0and allowed the appeal filed by the Department. On appeal\u00a0 High Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in excluding from the total business income of the assessee the receipts of reassortment charges and the labour commission for the purpose of calculation of deduction under S.80HHC of the Act. (AY. 1991-92)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 80HHC : Export business-Business profits-Receipts by way of reassortment charges and labour commission-Cannot be excluded from business profits for purpose of computation of  business profits- Prior to amendment with effect from April  1, 1992.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10790","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-2O2","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10790","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10790"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10790\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10791,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10790\/revisions\/10791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10790"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10790"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10790"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}