{"id":11395,"date":"2020-05-17T07:15:27","date_gmt":"2020-05-17T07:15:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/st-thomos-orthodox-syrain-church-v-cit-e-2020-185-dtr-326-312-ctr-430-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2020-05-17T07:15:27","modified_gmt":"2020-05-17T07:15:27","slug":"st-thomos-orthodox-syrain-church-v-cit-e-2020-185-dtr-326-312-ctr-430-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/st-thomos-orthodox-syrain-church-v-cit-e-2020-185-dtr-326-312-ctr-430-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"St. Thomos Orthodox Syrain Church v. CIT (E) 2020) 185 DTR 326 \/ 312 CTR 430 (Bom.) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Petitioner carries on various charitable activities including services of spiritual nature. The Petitioner filed the return of income on 19 September 2015 under S.\u00a0 139(4A) disclosing &#8216;NIL&#8217; income after claiming exemption under S.\u00a0 11 of the Act. It is the Petitioner&#8217;s case that the Petitioner had claimed accumulation of income to the tune of Rs.58,00,000\/-under S.\u00a0 11 (2) of the Act. The Petitioner received an intimation under section 143(1) of the Act on 21 October 2016. By this intimation, the benefit of accumulation under S.\u00a0 11(2) was refused, according to the Petitioner, because the Form 10 required to be filed under the Income-tax Rules, 1962, was filed beyond the period specified in S.\u00a0 11(2). Application made for condonation of application was refused. On writ the petitioner contended that\u00a0\u00a0 it has been made under a wrong headthe error is procedural and the substantive claim of accumulation should not have been defeated in such a manner. High Court\u00a0 directed the CIT (E) to consider the claim on merits order of rejection by CIT (E) was set aside.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes\u2013Accumulation of income-Order of rejection by CIT (E) was set aside. [S. 11(2), 12AA, 119(2)(b), 139(4A), 143(1),  Form No 10, Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-2XN","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11395"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11395\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11396,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11395\/revisions\/11396"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}