{"id":11445,"date":"2020-05-17T07:37:46","date_gmt":"2020-05-17T07:37:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/s-s-landmarks-v-ito-2020-185-dtr-149-312-ctr-402-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2021-06-04T09:41:23","modified_gmt":"2021-06-04T04:11:23","slug":"s-s-landmarks-v-ito-2020-185-dtr-149-312-ctr-402-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/s-s-landmarks-v-ito-2020-185-dtr-149-312-ctr-402-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"S. S. Landmarks v. ITO (2020) 185 DTR 149 \/ 312 CTR 402\/ 274 Taxman 331 (Bom.) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition\u00a0 the Court held that, merely alleging that there is failure to disclose truly and fully all material facts necessary for assessment, would not satisfy the jurisdictional requirement unless the reasons indicate what material facts the Petitioner had failed to disclose fully and truly during the course of the regular assessment. \u00a0Referred Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. v.Dy.CIT (E) (2014) \u00a0365 ITR 181 (Bom) (HC)\u00a0 wherein the Court\u00a0 observed that \u201c\u00a0 In the present case, admittedly, there are no details given by the Assessing Officer (respondent no.1) as to which fact or material was not disclosed by the petitioner that led to its income escaping assessment. There is merely a bald assertion in the reasons that there was a failure on the part of the petitioner to disclose fully and truly all material facts without giving any details thereof. This being the case, the impugned notice is bad in law and on this ground alone the petitioner is entitled to succeed in this writ petition\u201d\u00a0 (AY. 2012-13)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-After the   expiry of four years-Housing projects\u2013Completion certificate\u2013No failure to disclose material facts\u2013Reassessment notice is held to be bad in law. [S.80(IB)(10), 148, Art.226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-2YB","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11445"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11445\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18903,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11445\/revisions\/18903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}