{"id":11691,"date":"2020-05-31T07:10:46","date_gmt":"2020-05-31T07:10:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kedarnath-agarwal-dead-anr-v-dhanraji-devi-dead-by-lrs-anr-2004-8-scc-76-editorial-the-bombay-high-court-has-followed-the-above-principle-in-the-case-of-sushila-shantilal-jhaveri-vs-uoi\/"},"modified":"2020-05-31T07:10:46","modified_gmt":"2020-05-31T07:10:46","slug":"kedarnath-agarwal-dead-anr-v-dhanraji-devi-dead-by-lrs-anr-2004-8-scc-76-editorial-the-bombay-high-court-has-followed-the-above-principle-in-the-case-of-sushila-shantilal-jhaveri-vs-uoi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kedarnath-agarwal-dead-anr-v-dhanraji-devi-dead-by-lrs-anr-2004-8-scc-76-editorial-the-bombay-high-court-has-followed-the-above-principle-in-the-case-of-sushila-shantilal-jhaveri-vs-uoi\/","title":{"rendered":"Kedarnath Agarwal (dead) & Anr.v Dhanraji Devi (dead) by lrs & Anr. (2004) 8 SCC 76 Editorial : The Bombay High Court has followed the above principle in the case of Sushila Shantilal Jhaveri vs. UOI & Anr (2006) 286 ITR 428 (Bom) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"

The basic rule is that the rights of the parties should be determined on the basis of the date of institution of the suit or proceeding, however a court of law may take into account subsequent events inter alia in the following circumstances:.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. the relief claimed originally has by reason of subsequent change of circumstances become inappropriate; or<\/li>\n
  2. it is necessary to take notice of subsequent events in order to shortern litigation; or<\/li>\n
  3. it is necessary to do so in order to do complete justice between the parties<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of letting ,Rent and Eviction) Act ,1972 <\/p>\n

    S.21: Subsequent event should be considered by courts-It is necessary to do so in order to do complete justice between parties – Test laid down:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allied-laws"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-32z","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11691"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11692,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11691\/revisions\/11692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}