{"id":12328,"date":"2020-09-21T06:51:58","date_gmt":"2020-09-21T06:51:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/durlabhai-kanubhai-rajpara-v-ito-2020-424-itr-428-gujhc\/"},"modified":"2020-09-21T06:51:58","modified_gmt":"2020-09-21T06:51:58","slug":"durlabhai-kanubhai-rajpara-v-ito-2020-424-itr-428-gujhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/durlabhai-kanubhai-rajpara-v-ito-2020-424-itr-428-gujhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Durlabhai Kanubhai Rajpara v .ITO (2020) 424 ITR 428 (Guj)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition the Court held that the petitioner at the first point of time had objected to the issuance of notice under section\u00a0148\u00a0in the name of his deceased father (assessee) and had not participated or filed any return pursuant to the notice. Therefore, the legal representatives not having waived the requirement of notice and not having submitted to the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer pursuant thereto, the provisions of S. \u00a0292A\u00a0would not be attracted and hence the notice had to be treated as invalid. Even prior to the issuance of such notice, the Department was aware about the death of the petitioner&#8217;s father (assessee) since in response to the summons issued under S. \u00a0131(1A)\u00a0the petitioner had intimated the Department about the death of the assessee. Therefore, the Department could not say that it was not aware of the death of the petitioner\u2019s father (assessee) and could have belatedly served the notice under S. \u00a0159\u00a0upon the legal representatives of the deceased-assessee. The notice dated March 28, 2018 issued in the name of the deceased-assessee by the Assessing Officer under S.148\u00a0as well as further proceedings thereto were to be quashed and set aside.( AY.2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S.147: Reassessment \u2014Notice issued in name of dead person \u2014  Notice and proceedings invalid [ S.131(IA) 148 ,159 , 292A Art . 226  ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3cQ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12328"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12328\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12329,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12328\/revisions\/12329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}