{"id":12700,"date":"2020-10-07T08:41:04","date_gmt":"2020-10-07T08:41:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/oasys-green-tech-private-ltd-v-ito-2020-426-itr-124-madhc\/"},"modified":"2021-05-09T12:42:58","modified_gmt":"2021-05-09T07:12:58","slug":"oasys-green-tech-private-ltd-v-ito-2020-426-itr-124-madhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/oasys-green-tech-private-ltd-v-ito-2020-426-itr-124-madhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Oasys Green Tech Private Ltd v. ITO (2020) 426 ITR 124\/ 194 DTR 96\/ 316 CTR 897\/ 272 Taxman 147 (Mad)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An order of assessment was challenged on the ground that the entity to whom notice\u00a0 was issued and based upon which the order had been passed, did not exist at the time of issuance of notice and passing of the order . Dismissing the petition the court held that, the stand of the petitioner to the effect that proceedings for reassessment ought to have been issued only in the name of OGT was clearly misconceived in so far as the Department had not been put to notice of the factum of amalgamation of OAS with the petitioner OGT till September 14, 2017 and the petitioner had also, by filing a return in the name of OAS and receiving refunds addressed to OAS, furthered the impression that OAS was an existing entity. Thus there was no infirmity in law in so far as the proceedings for reassessment were concerned and they were valid.(AY.2010-11)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S.148 : Reassessment \u2014Amalgamation-Revenue not informed about amalgamation \u2014 Return filed in name of  assessee-Company and refund received in its  name \u2014 Notice  is held to be valid .[ S.147 , Art 226 ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3iQ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12700"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12700\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17709,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12700\/revisions\/17709"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}