{"id":13265,"date":"2020-10-25T13:31:10","date_gmt":"2020-10-25T13:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/procter-gamble-hygine-healthcare-ltd-v-cit-2020-bcaj-may-2020-p-72-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2020-10-25T13:31:10","modified_gmt":"2020-10-25T13:31:10","slug":"procter-gamble-hygine-healthcare-ltd-v-cit-2020-bcaj-may-2020-p-72-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/procter-gamble-hygine-healthcare-ltd-v-cit-2020-bcaj-may-2020-p-72-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Procter &#038; Gamble Hygine &#038; Healthcare Ltd v .CIT ( 2020) BCAJ -May -2020 \u2013 P. 72 ( Bom) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the assessee against the order under section 263 of the\u00a0 Act\u00a0 there was no reasonable cause and the assessee has taken conscious decision not to file appeal against the revision order on the basis of legal opinion . Accordingly the delay of 458 days in filing the appeal was not condoned . On\u00a0\u00a0 appeal the High Court held that in the interest of justice the delay in filing of an appeal\u00a0 was condoned and the appellant was directed to pay costs of Rs 25000 to the Maharashtra State legal Services Authority\u00a0 . ( ITA No. 1210 of 2017 dt \u2013 4 -2 -2020 ) ( AY. 2008 -09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal \u2013 Legal opinion &#8211; Delay of  458 in filing an appeal  against an order under section 263 of the Act  was condoned on payment of cost of Rs 25000 to the Maharashtra  State legal Services .  [ S. 253, 263 , 260A ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3rX","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13265"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13266,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13265\/revisions\/13266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}