{"id":13549,"date":"2020-11-01T14:08:37","date_gmt":"2020-11-01T14:08:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mahavir-steel-industries-ltd-v-acit-2020-81-itr-34-sn-pune-trib\/"},"modified":"2020-11-01T14:08:37","modified_gmt":"2020-11-01T14:08:37","slug":"mahavir-steel-industries-ltd-v-acit-2020-81-itr-34-sn-pune-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mahavir-steel-industries-ltd-v-acit-2020-81-itr-34-sn-pune-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Mahavir Steel Industries Ltd. v ACIT (2020) 81 ITR 34 (SN) (Pune ) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunal held that if the interest-free funds were sufficient to meet the investments, the presumption would arise that the investments were out of interest-free funds accordingly the disallowance made under rule\u00a08D(2)\u00a0was to be deleted. Regarding rule\u00a08D(2)(iii)\u00a0there was nothing on record that the assessee made disallowance on its own in earning the exempt income. Therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer as confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) was to be sustained. The Department submitted that the assessee stated that no expenditure had incurred towards making the investments and the addition made under rule\u00a08D(2)(iii)\u00a0was to be upheld. Thus the disallowance made under rule\u00a08D(2)(iii)\u00a0to an extent of Rs. 1,17,760 was sustained.( AY.2012-13)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure &#8211; Exempt income &#8211; Investments far below reserves and surpluses \u2014 Presumption that  invested out of reserves and surpluses \u2014 No disallowance shown -Disallowance  to the extent of  Rs. 1,17,760 was sustained.  [ R.8D( 2)(ii) , 2(iii) ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3wx","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13549"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13550,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13549\/revisions\/13550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}