{"id":13932,"date":"2020-11-21T15:21:49","date_gmt":"2020-11-21T15:21:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-feroke-boards-ltd-2020-79-itr-22-207-ttj-106-cochin-trib\/"},"modified":"2021-06-25T08:57:11","modified_gmt":"2021-06-25T03:27:11","slug":"acit-v-feroke-boards-ltd-2020-79-itr-22-207-ttj-106-cochin-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-feroke-boards-ltd-2020-79-itr-22-207-ttj-106-cochin-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"ACIT v. Feroke Boards Ltd. (2020) 79 ITR 22\/207 TTJ 106  185 ITD 910\/ 194 DTR 264 (Cochin) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dealing with the issue of period of holding for computing capital gains the Tribunal held that \u201cfinancial asset\u201d has been described in the Act as share or security and the assets transferred by the assessee did not fall in the category of \u201cfinancial asset\u201d. Section\u00a02(11)\u00a0which defines the term \u201cblock of assets\u201d for the purpose of depreciation includes intangible assets. Since intangible assets were covered in the definition of \u201cblock of assets\u201d eligible for depreciation, they could not be again covered under the definition of \u201cfinancial asset\u201d as per Explanation (1)(i)(d) to section\u00a02(42A)\u00a0. Therefore, the period of holding could not be determined under Explanation 1(i)(e) but in terms of Explanation 1(i)(b) to section\u00a02(42A)\u00a0to determine whether or not an asset is a short-term capital asset. The assessee\u2019s case was a scheme of amalgamation and the assessee was an Indian company. Therefore, it was not correct for the Assessing Officer to consider April 1, 2008 as the date on which the assets were acquired because the brand name was already there with the amalgamated company which was registered with the Trade Marks Registry. Therefore, there was no transfer taking place on April 1, 2008. The period of holding was much more than 36 months when the relinquishment or sale took place (on May 18, 2010). Therefore, the Assessing Officer ought not to have taxed the receipts as short-term capital gains but should have taxed them as long-term capital gains. The Explanation to section\u00a049(1)\u00a0is a benevolent provision to extend applicability of the term \u201cprevious owner\u201d to cover cases like the assessee\u2019s. Here the previous owner was the amalgamating company and this company did not acquire the assets in a mode referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii) or clause (iii) or clause (iv) of section\u00a049(1)\u00a0. However, as no purchase price was paid by the amalgamating company, the cost of acquisition was taken as nil as required under section\u00a055(2)(a)(ii)\u00a0.( AY.2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 49 : Capital gains &#8211; Previous owner &#8211; Cost of acquisition \u2013Financial asset &#8211; Period of holding -Brand name &#8211; Transfer of  intangible assets with right to carry on business &#8211; Holding period should be determined including period of holding of  previous owner, ie. Amalgamating Company-No transfer taking place on appointed date of Amalgamation \u2014 Period of  holding more than 36 months \u2014 Receipt taxable as long-term capital gains  [ S. 2(11) ,2(42A) , 45, 49 (1), 55(2)(a)(ii)  ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3CI","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13932"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13932\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19620,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13932\/revisions\/19620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}