{"id":14460,"date":"2020-12-13T13:19:04","date_gmt":"2020-12-13T13:19:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sarwar-mohd-khan-v-acit-2020-78-itr-39-sn-indore-trib\/"},"modified":"2020-12-13T13:19:04","modified_gmt":"2020-12-13T13:19:04","slug":"sarwar-mohd-khan-v-acit-2020-78-itr-39-sn-indore-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sarwar-mohd-khan-v-acit-2020-78-itr-39-sn-indore-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Sarwar Mohd. Khan v. ACIT (2020) 78 ITR 39 (SN) (Indore ) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunal held thatno addition was made by the Assessing Officer in the reassessment proceedings for the reasons recorded in the notice issued under section\u00a0148\u00a0. If after issuance of notice under section\u00a0148\u00a0the Assessing Officer accepts the contentions of the assessee and holds that the income which he initially formed a reason to believe had escaped assessment, had as a matter of fact not escaped assessment, it was not open to him independently to assess some other income. The assessment order was illegal since the Assessing Officer had not made any addition on the \u201creasons to believe\u201d recorded in the notice issued under section\u00a0148\u00a0and had himself so admitted because the early withdrawal of the amount deposited in the capital gains account before the expiry of the time period provided under section\u00a054F\u00a0had been offered to tax by the assessee and shown as income for the assessment year 2011-12. ( AY.2008-09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment \u2013 No addition was made  as regards  reasons recorded \u2013 Reassessment is held to be not valid [ S.54F,148 ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3Le","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14460"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14461,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14460\/revisions\/14461"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}