{"id":14747,"date":"2020-12-31T14:48:57","date_gmt":"2020-12-31T14:48:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-ambuja-darla-kashlog-mangoo-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-94-195-dtr-99-317-ctr-363-269-taxman-618-hp-hc\/"},"modified":"2020-12-31T14:48:57","modified_gmt":"2020-12-31T14:48:57","slug":"pcit-v-ambuja-darla-kashlog-mangoo-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-94-195-dtr-99-317-ctr-363-269-taxman-618-hp-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-ambuja-darla-kashlog-mangoo-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-94-195-dtr-99-317-ctr-363-269-taxman-618-hp-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Ambuja Darla Kashlog Mangoo Transport Co-Operative Society (2020) 428 ITR 94\/ 195 DTR 99\/ 317 CTR 363\/ 269 Taxman 618 (HP) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal the Court held that the interest on the delayed refund was part of the principal amount and the delayed interest included the interest for not refunding the principal amount. The net of interest partook of the character of \u201camount due\u201d under section\u00a0244A\u00a0. The Tribunal was right in directing the Department to pay compensation in the form of simple interest on the amount due at the rate at which the assessee otherwise would have been entitled to under section\u00a0244A\u00a0on the delayed refund up to the date of issue of refund. Followed CIT v. H. E. G. LTD.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxlawsonline.com\/%5b2010%5d%20324%20ITR%200331\">(2010)\u00a0 324 ITR 331<\/a>\u00a0(SC)\u00a0 <em>(<\/em> AY.1996-97 to 1999-2000)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 244A : Refund \u2013 Interest on refunds \u2013 Delay in refund of  excess of  tax deducted at  source &#8211; Department to pay compensation in form of  simple interest on amount due [ S. 237,  243  ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14747","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3PR","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14747","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14747"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14747\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14748,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14747\/revisions\/14748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}