{"id":14767,"date":"2020-12-31T15:40:42","date_gmt":"2020-12-31T15:40:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-solan-district-truck-operators-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-264-274-taxman-397-hp-hc-2\/"},"modified":"2020-12-31T15:40:42","modified_gmt":"2020-12-31T15:40:42","slug":"pcit-v-solan-district-truck-operators-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-264-274-taxman-397-hp-hc-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-solan-district-truck-operators-transport-co-operative-society-2020-428-itr-264-274-taxman-397-hp-hc-2\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Solan District Truck Operators Transport Co-Operative Society (2020) 428 ITR 264 \/ 274 Taxman 397 (HP) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that ; though the Departmental authorities were directed by the \u00a0Notification \/Circular No.17 of 2019, dated August 8, 2019 ((2019) 416 ITR 106 (St) \u00a0\u00a0 of the Central Board of Direct Taxes not to file an appeal before the High Court where the monetary limit was less than Rs. 1 crore, but in the notification of the Central Board of Direct Taxes \u00a0Circular No. 3 of 2018, dt. 11th July, 2018, there was an exception to the effect that if there was a valid question, where an order, notification, instruction or circular was to be challenged as illegal or ultra vires, an appeal could be filed before the High Court on the merits notwithstanding the fact that the tax effect entailed was less than Rs. 1 crore. No such exception was available to the Department. ( AY.1996-97 to 1999-2000)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 260A : Appeal &#8211; High Court -Monetary limit-  Case not falling within exception \u2014 Appeal not maintainable  [ S.253 , 254(2) ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3Qb","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14767"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14768,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14767\/revisions\/14768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}