{"id":15137,"date":"2021-02-02T12:22:49","date_gmt":"2021-02-02T12:22:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/state-of-u-p-v-sudhir-kumar-singh-sc-www-itatonline-org-2\/"},"modified":"2021-02-02T12:22:49","modified_gmt":"2021-02-02T12:22:49","slug":"state-of-u-p-v-sudhir-kumar-singh-sc-www-itatonline-org-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/state-of-u-p-v-sudhir-kumar-singh-sc-www-itatonline-org-2\/","title":{"rendered":"State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh (SC), www.itatonline.org"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The principles of natural justice have undergone a sea change. The earlier view that even a small violation would result in the order being rendered a nullity is not correct. Some real prejudice must be caused to the complainant by the refusal to follow natural justice. The prejudice must not merely be the apprehension of a litigant. No prejudice is caused to the person complaining of the breach of natural justice where such person does not dispute the case against him or it. There is a clear distinction between cases where there was no hearing at all and the cases where there was mere technical infringement of the principle\u00a0\u00a0 ( CA No 3498 of 2020 , Arising ALP (C ) No. 5136 of 2020\u00a0 dt .16 -10 -2020 ) <\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Interpretation -Natural Justice \u2013   There is a clear distinction between cases where there was no hearing at all and the cases where there was mere technical infringement of the principle  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-3W9","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15137"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15138,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15137\/revisions\/15138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}