{"id":15445,"date":"2021-03-02T12:42:21","date_gmt":"2021-03-02T07:12:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-aztec-software-technology-ltd-2020-428-itr-245-275-taxman-206-karn-hc\/"},"modified":"2021-03-02T12:42:21","modified_gmt":"2021-03-02T07:12:21","slug":"cit-v-aztec-software-technology-ltd-2020-428-itr-245-275-taxman-206-karn-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-aztec-software-technology-ltd-2020-428-itr-245-275-taxman-206-karn-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT v. Aztec Software Technology Ltd. (2020) 428 ITR 245\/ 275 Taxman 206 (Karn.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court held that\u00a0\u00a0 the twin conditions were required to be satisfied to invoke the revisional jurisdiction under section\u00a0263, firstly, the order of the Assessing Officer was erroneous and secondly, that it was prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue on account of erroneous order. The view taken by the Assessing Officer was a plausible view and was not erroneous. Therefore, invocation of powers under section\u00a0263\u00a0was not justified. The Tribunal had rightly set aside the order passed by the Commissioner. (AY. 2005-06)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Export of  computer software-Development of software at  client\u2019s site outside India-Assessing Officer taking one of  two plausible views-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 10A]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-417","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15445"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15445\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15446,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15445\/revisions\/15446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}