{"id":18275,"date":"2021-05-17T10:59:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-17T05:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-e-v-india-habitat-centre-2021-86-itr-290-delhitrib\/"},"modified":"2021-05-17T10:59:00","modified_gmt":"2021-05-17T05:29:00","slug":"acit-e-v-india-habitat-centre-2021-86-itr-290-delhitrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-e-v-india-habitat-centre-2021-86-itr-290-delhitrib\/","title":{"rendered":"ACIT (E) v. India Habitat Centre (2021) 86 ITR 290 (Delhi)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunal held that the assessee-society was a registered society under section 12A which was applicable to the assessment year under appeal because the registration in favour of the assessee-society was still in force. The nature of activity and objects of the assessee-society were the same as had been considered in earlier years. For the assessment year 2012-13, the Tribunal had held that the income of the assessee-society was entitled to exemption under section 11. The Tribunal order was challenged by the Revenue before the High Court which had dismissed the appeal holding that the assessee-society was entitled to claim relief under sections 11, 12 and 13. Once the activities of the assessee-society were charitable, the principle of mutuality became superfluous.( AY.2014-15)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes &#8211; Principle of  consistency- No change in the nature of activities \u2013 Denial of exemption is not justified- Once the activities of the assessee-society were charitable, the principle of mutuality became superfluous.  [ S. 2(15), 12, 12A, 13 ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-4KL","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18275"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18276,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18275\/revisions\/18276"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}