{"id":18576,"date":"2021-05-25T11:31:29","date_gmt":"2021-05-25T06:01:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/johnson-controls-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-85-itr-120-mum-trib\/"},"modified":"2021-05-25T11:31:29","modified_gmt":"2021-05-25T06:01:29","slug":"johnson-controls-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-85-itr-120-mum-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/johnson-controls-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-85-itr-120-mum-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Johnson Controls (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 85 ITR 120 (Mum.)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunal held that as regards direct sales Compensation, direction\u00a0 was given to\u00a0 Assessing Officer to adopt average commission rate of\u00a0 3.93 Per Cent. as appropriate rate for benchmarking As regards\u00a0 bad\u00a0 debts written off\u00a0 adjustment made towards bad debts written off\u00a0 to be deleted. As regards, royalty matter remanded.\u00a0 The Tribunal observed that the order was being pronounced much after the expiry of 90 days from the date of conclusion of hearing on account of nationwide lock-down due to pandemic Covid-19 applying the exception to 90 day time limit for pronouncement of orders inherent in rule\u00a034(5)(c)\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. (AY. 2010-11, 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Direct Sales Compensation-Direction to Assessing Officer to adopt average commission rate of  3.93 Per Cent. as appropriate rate for benchmarking-Bad debts written off-Adjustment made towards bad debts written off  to be deleted-Royalty-Matter remanded.-Order pronounced much after the expiry of 90 days. [S. 254(1)]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-4PC","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18576"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18576\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18577,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18576\/revisions\/18577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}