{"id":18827,"date":"2021-05-31T19:46:58","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T14:16:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/prasad-multi-services-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2020-317-ctr-873-guj-hc\/"},"modified":"2021-07-02T05:50:50","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T00:20:50","slug":"prasad-multi-services-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2020-317-ctr-873-guj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/prasad-multi-services-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2020-317-ctr-873-guj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Prasad Multi Services (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020) 423 ITR 542\/ 317 CTR 873 (Guj.) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The appellant claims depreciation at the rate of 30% on various types of cranes, viz. Telescopic Cranes, Rail for Tower Cranes, Tower Cranes, Mobile Tower Cranes, Crawler Cranes, Tower Crane Masts and Hydra Cranes. The Assessing Officer allowed the depreciation at 15%.\u00a0 The CIT (A) held that\u00a0 \u00a0only the Hydra Cranes can be termed as &#8220;Motor Cranes&#8221; and accordingly allowed depreciation at the rate of 30%. The CIT(A), however, confirmed the disallowance on all other types of cranes. Appellate Tribunal also affirmed the order of CIT (A) .\u00a0 On appeal\u00a0 allowing the appeal the Court held that there is thumping evidence on record to indicate that the assessee is involved in the business of hiring the cranes. He might be using the cranes for his personal construction business too, but that does not disentitle him to claim higher depreciation once it is shown that the assessee is in the business of hiring the cranes. The assessee is entitle to depreciation at 30% . Order of\u00a0 Tribunal is reversed .  Referred  Circulars and Notifications: Instruction No. 617, dated 13-9-1973    (AY . 2011-12<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 32 : Depreciation \u2013 Cranes used in hiring business- Nomenclature in Motor Vehicle Act can not be test for allowability of depreciation &#8211;  Entitle depreciation at 30% . <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-4TF","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18827"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18827\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19787,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18827\/revisions\/19787"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}