{"id":19265,"date":"2021-06-14T06:17:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-14T00:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/uddhav-krishna-bankar-v-ito-2020-196-dtr-129-208-ttj-1005-2021-186-itd-309-smc-pune-trib\/"},"modified":"2021-06-14T06:17:00","modified_gmt":"2021-06-14T00:47:00","slug":"uddhav-krishna-bankar-v-ito-2020-196-dtr-129-208-ttj-1005-2021-186-itd-309-smc-pune-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/uddhav-krishna-bankar-v-ito-2020-196-dtr-129-208-ttj-1005-2021-186-itd-309-smc-pune-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Uddhav Krishna Bankar. v. ITO (2020) 196 DTR 129\/ 208 TTJ 1005 \/ (2021) 186 ITD 309 (SMC) (Pune) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee sold agricultural land on 12-10-2011 and filed its return of income declaring long term capital gains after claiming exemption under section 54B towards purchase of another agricultural land .\u00a0 Assessing Officer denied assessee&#8217;s claim under section 54B on ground that she did not deposit amount of capital gains in designated capital gains account maintained with a bank before due date of filing return under section 139(1) . CIT (A) affirmed the view of Assessing Officer . On appeal the Tribunal held section 139 was to be read here as section 139(4) and not to be confined to section 139(1) alone . As the time under section 139(4) was available up to 31-3-2014 .\u00a0 Assessee opened a bank account under designated Capital gain account scheme on 3-8-2013 and purchased a new property on 26-8-2013 which was well within given period of two years from date of transfer . Accordingly\u00a0 the assessee\u00a0 having complied with requirement of section 54B(2) in light of time limit as per section 139(4)\u00a0 denial of exemption is held to be not justified\u00a0 . (AY. 2012 -13 )<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 54B : Capital gains &#8211; Land used for agricultural purposes -Agricultural land was sold by assessee on 12-10-2011 and new agricultural land was purchased on 26-8-2013- Denial of exemption is held to be not justified [ S. 45, 54B(2), 139(4) ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-50J","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19265"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19266,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19265\/revisions\/19266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}