{"id":19897,"date":"2021-07-02T13:20:35","date_gmt":"2021-07-02T07:50:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/b-s-associates-v-dy-cit-2020-187-dtr-202-203-ttj-728-ahd-trib\/"},"modified":"2021-07-02T13:20:35","modified_gmt":"2021-07-02T07:50:35","slug":"b-s-associates-v-dy-cit-2020-187-dtr-202-203-ttj-728-ahd-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/b-s-associates-v-dy-cit-2020-187-dtr-202-203-ttj-728-ahd-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"B.S.Associates v. Dy.CIT ( 2020) 187 DTR 202 \/ 203 TTJ 728( Ahd ) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee has purchased land admeasuring 1.05 acres for Rs.1,20,00,000. \u00a0Summons u\/s 131 of the IT Act were issued to the seller (i.e. president of the Society Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti).\u00a0 On the basis of\u00a0 stamp value the Assessing office made\u00a0 the addition on this account to the extent of Rs. 19,41,000 only (Rs. 1,39,41,000 &#8211; Rs. 1,20,00,000\/-) being the difference between Actual market value (being guideline value as taken by CIT(A)) and the purchase price was confirmed by CIT. On appeal the Tribunal held that\u00a0 no evidence has been brought on record which can prove that assessee had paid amount over and above the stated purchase consideration of Rs.1,20,00,000\/ and merely on the basis of statement of third party addition is held to be not justified .\u00a0 (AY. 2009-10 ,2010-11 )\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 69B : Amounts of investments not fully disclosed in books of account \u2013Burden is on the revenue to prove \u2013 Merely on the basis of stamp valuation addition cannot be made .  [ S. 45, 48, 50C(2), 69 ]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-5aV","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19897"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19898,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19897\/revisions\/19898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}