{"id":20989,"date":"2021-08-05T18:39:54","date_gmt":"2021-08-05T13:09:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/provimi-animal-nutrition-india-pvt-ltd-v-pcit-2021-187-itd-214-85-itr-9-sn-bang-trib\/"},"modified":"2021-08-05T18:39:54","modified_gmt":"2021-08-05T13:09:54","slug":"provimi-animal-nutrition-india-pvt-ltd-v-pcit-2021-187-itd-214-85-itr-9-sn-bang-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/provimi-animal-nutrition-india-pvt-ltd-v-pcit-2021-187-itd-214-85-itr-9-sn-bang-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Provimi Animal Nutrition India Pvt. Ltd. v. PCIT (2021) 187 ITD 214 \/ 85 ITR 9 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee was engaged in business of manufacture and sale of animal feed supplements and veterinary drugs.\u00a0 Assessee claimed deduction under section 35(2AB).\u00a0 Assessing Officer allowed the claim.\u00a0 PCIT passed the revision order\u00a0 on\u00a0 the ground that assessee did not furnish approval granted by Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) in Form 3CL before Assessing Officer in support of its claim made under section 35(2AB) till date of completion of assessment, thus, assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 35(2AB). On appeal the Tribunal held that\u00a0 prior to 1-7-2016, Form 3CL granting approval by prescribed authority in relation to quantification of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) had no legal sanctity and it was only with effect from 1-7-2016 with amendment to rule 6(7A)(b) that quantification of weighted deduction under section 35(2AB) got significance,\u00a0 therefore, assessee was to be allowed deduction under section 35(2AB) and; accordingly, impugned invocation of revision jurisdiction under section 263 was unjustified.\u00a0 (AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Non furnishing of approval-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 35(2AB), R. 6(7A)(b)] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-5sx","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20989"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20989\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20990,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20989\/revisions\/20990"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}