{"id":21231,"date":"2021-08-30T18:28:29","date_gmt":"2021-08-30T12:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ramesh-and-ors-v-laxmi-bai-air-2021mp-56-air-online-2021-mp-98\/"},"modified":"2021-08-30T18:28:29","modified_gmt":"2021-08-30T12:58:29","slug":"ramesh-and-ors-v-laxmi-bai-air-2021mp-56-air-online-2021-mp-98","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ramesh-and-ors-v-laxmi-bai-air-2021mp-56-air-online-2021-mp-98\/","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh and ors v . Laxmi Bai AIR 2021MP 56\/ AIR Online 2021 MP 98"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court held that learned Additional District Judge is required to decide first the application under section 5 of Limitation Act , unless the application for condonation of delay filed along with it is decided in favour of the appellant , appeal cannot be decided on merit. Order of Additional District judge is set a side with the direction to decide the application filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act first before proceeding further in the pending first appeal . \u00a0Followed S.V.Matha Prasad v. Lalchand Meghraj\u00a0 ( 2007 ) 14 SCC 772, AIR 2007 SC ( Supp ) \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(MP No. 3930 of 2019 dt .1 -3 2021 )<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Limitation Act, ( 36 of 1963 )<br \/>\nS. 5: Extension of prescribed period in certain cases &#8211; First appeal- Appellate Court cannot decide appeal unless application for condonation of delay is decided in favour of the appellant .  [ CPC, 1908 ,  Rule 11, 13 , O. 43 ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gst-law"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-5wr","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21231"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21231\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21232,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21231\/revisions\/21232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}