{"id":22002,"date":"2021-09-29T11:40:22","date_gmt":"2021-09-29T06:10:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/devinder-singh-v-municipal-council-2011-6-scc-584-editorial-in-cit-ltu-v-texas-instruments-india-pvt-ltd-2021435-itr-1-321-ctr-34-karn-hc-the-court-held-that-engineers-employed-in\/"},"modified":"2021-09-29T11:40:22","modified_gmt":"2021-09-29T06:10:22","slug":"devinder-singh-v-municipal-council-2011-6-scc-584-editorial-in-cit-ltu-v-texas-instruments-india-pvt-ltd-2021435-itr-1-321-ctr-34-karn-hc-the-court-held-that-engineers-employed-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/devinder-singh-v-municipal-council-2011-6-scc-584-editorial-in-cit-ltu-v-texas-instruments-india-pvt-ltd-2021435-itr-1-321-ctr-34-karn-hc-the-court-held-that-engineers-employed-in\/","title":{"rendered":"Devinder Singh v. Municipal Council ( 2011) 6 SCC 584 Editorial : In CIT (LTU) . v. Texas Instruments India Pvt. Ltd. (2021)435 ITR 1 \/ 321 CTR 34 (Karn) (HC) the court held that engineers employed in a software company are worken for the purpose of section 80JJAA of the Income -tax Act , 1961 ."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court held that\u00a0 whenever an employer challenges \u00a0the maintainability\u00a0 of Industrial dispute on the ground that the employee is not a workman with in. the meaning of section 2(s) of the Act , what the labour court \/Industrial\u00a0 Tribunal is required to consider is whether the person is employed in an industry for hire or reward for doing manual , unskilled , operational , technical or clerical work in an industry. Once\u00a0 test of employment for hire or reward for doing the specified type of work is satisfied , the employee would fall within the definition of\u00a0 workmen . \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 <\/p>\n<p>S. 2(s): Workmen- Test of employment for hire or reward for doing the specified work is satisfied the employee would fall with in the definition of workmen <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allied-laws"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-5IS","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22002"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22002\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22003,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22002\/revisions\/22003"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}