{"id":23490,"date":"2022-01-06T11:32:58","date_gmt":"2022-01-06T06:02:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ycd-ind-v-national-faceless-assessment-centre-2021-437-itr-119-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2022-02-03T15:33:11","modified_gmt":"2022-02-03T10:03:11","slug":"ycd-ind-v-national-faceless-assessment-centre-2021-437-itr-119-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ycd-ind-v-national-faceless-assessment-centre-2021-437-itr-119-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"YCD Industries . v. National Faceless Assessment Centre (2021) 437 ITR 119 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition the Court held that the principles of natural justice had been violated. The Department could not have side-stepped statutory safeguards put in place by the Legislature. Admittedly, the assessee\u2019s income was varied to its prejudice with an addition in the assessment order under section\u00a0115BBEE. Had the notice cum draft assessment been issued the assessee could have requested for a personal hearing in the matter. The justification proffered by the Department that notices under sections\u00a0143(2)\u00a0and\u00a0142(1)\u00a0were issued prior to the passing of the assessment order could not be accepted in view of the schematic design of the statute. Accordingly, the assessment order and the notices of tax demand and penalty issued under section\u00a0156\u00a0and section\u00a0274\u00a0read with section\u00a0270A\u00a0were set aside. (AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Draft assessment order-Opportunity of hearing was not granted-Order was set aside.  [S. 115BBEE, 156, 270A, 274] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-66S","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23490"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24559,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23490\/revisions\/24559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}