{"id":25049,"date":"2022-02-21T16:26:00","date_gmt":"2022-02-21T10:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/basf-catalysts-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-283-taxman-591-mad-hc\/"},"modified":"2022-02-21T16:26:00","modified_gmt":"2022-02-21T10:56:00","slug":"basf-catalysts-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-283-taxman-591-mad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/basf-catalysts-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2021-283-taxman-591-mad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"BASF Catalysts India (P) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 283 Taxman 591 (Mad.) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The reassessment issued reassessment notice on the \u00a0ground that assessee had not deducted TDS on payment made by it to its Associate Enterprise (AE) in USA towards shared\/cost sharing expenses.\u00a0 On writ the Assessee contended issue regarding non-deduction of TDS on payment made for shared\/cost sharing expenses to its AE was already pending in appeal before Tribunal, thus, same could not be a ground for reopening of assessment under. Court held that \u00a0issue pending adjudication before Tribunal was about payment made by assessee to its AE, namely, BASF, in Malaysia whereas reasons for reopening was about non-deduction of TDS on payment made by assessee to its AE, namely, BASF, USA. There was a prima facie reason for reopening of assessment notice was held to be valid. (AY. 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Failure to deduct tax at source-Reassessment notice was held to be justified [S. 40(a)(i),  Art. 226]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-6w1","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25049"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25050,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25049\/revisions\/25050"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}