{"id":25177,"date":"2022-02-26T13:54:19","date_gmt":"2022-02-26T08:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-premier-tyres-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc-cit-v-ptl-enterprises-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc\/"},"modified":"2022-07-03T18:47:42","modified_gmt":"2022-07-03T13:17:42","slug":"cit-v-premier-tyres-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc-cit-v-ptl-enterprises-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-premier-tyres-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc-cit-v-ptl-enterprises-ltd-2021-439-itr-346-ker-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT v. Premier Tyres Ltd. (2021) 439 ITR 346 \/ ( 2022)  285 Taxman 596 \/212 DTR 404\/ 326 CTR 282  (Ker.)(HC) CIT v. PTL Enterprises Ltd. (2021) 439 ITR 346 \/( 2022) 212 DTR 404 \/ 326 CTR 282(Ker.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that\u00a0 the assessee was obligated to work under a statutory approved scheme; the lease of eight years was to ATL, which was in the same business and the lease was for utilising the plant, machinery, etc. for manufacturing tyres; the actuals were reimbursed to assessee by ATL; the work force of the assessee had been deployed for manufacturing tyres; the total production from the assessee unit was taken over by ATL; over all affairs of assessee company were made viable by entering into settlement; coupled with all other primary circumstances, the assessee employed commercial assets to earn income. The scheme was for providing a solution to the business problem of the assessee. The claim of lease rental receipt as income of business was justifiable for the assessment years. (AY.1996-97 to 2003-04)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 28(i) : Business income-lease rent-Scheme sanctioned by  BIFR-Assessable as business income. [S. 14] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-6y5","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25177"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27970,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25177\/revisions\/27970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}