{"id":25209,"date":"2022-02-26T14:00:02","date_gmt":"2022-02-26T08:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/smrutisudha-nayak-smt-v-uoi-2021-439-itr-193-208-dtr-1-323-ctr-617-orissahc\/"},"modified":"2022-02-26T14:00:02","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T08:30:02","slug":"smrutisudha-nayak-smt-v-uoi-2021-439-itr-193-208-dtr-1-323-ctr-617-orissahc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/smrutisudha-nayak-smt-v-uoi-2021-439-itr-193-208-dtr-1-323-ctr-617-orissahc\/","title":{"rendered":"Smrutisudha Nayak (Smt.) v. UOI (2021) 439 ITR 193 \/ 208 DTR 1 \/ 323 CTR 617 (Orissa)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court held that\u00a0 Section\u00a0132(1)\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Act, 1961, was amended by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009 authorizing the Additional Director or the Additional Commissioner or the Joint Director or the Joint Commissioner to issue a search warrant. This provision was given retrospective effect from June 1, 1994. In terms of the clarification issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes the amendment is clarificatory. Warrant of Authorisation issued by the Additional Director of Income-tax\u00a0 was held to be valid. Court also held that there being absolutely no incriminating materials found or seized at the time of search, there was no justification for the initiation of assessment proceedings under section\u00a0153A. The assessment proceedings were not valid. (AY.2002-03 to 2008-09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Warrant of Authorisation-Effect of  amendment of  Section 132(1) by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009-Amendment has retrospective effect from June 1, 1994 and is  clarificatory-Additional Director of  Income-Tax had  Authority to issue warrant of  authorisation-Without incriminating material proceedings u\/s 153A is not valid. [S. 132]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-6yB","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25209"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25210,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25209\/revisions\/25210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}