{"id":26711,"date":"2022-04-27T12:54:28","date_gmt":"2022-04-27T07:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bennett-coleman-and-co-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-441-itr-25-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2022-04-27T12:54:28","modified_gmt":"2022-04-27T07:24:28","slug":"bennett-coleman-and-co-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-441-itr-25-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bennett-coleman-and-co-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-441-itr-25-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 441 ITR 25 (Bom.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal the Court held that\u00a0 the Tribunal was right in holding that a fresh assessment made by the Assessing Officer to give effect to the directions of the Commissioner under section\u00a0263\u00a0setting aside the original assessment, constituted a regular assessment for purposes of section\u00a0215\u00a0 of the Act. The Deputy Commissioner in exercise of power under rule\u00a040\u00a0had held that delay in finalization of the assessment was not attributable to the assessee and therefore the assessee was not liable to pay interest under section\u00a0215\u00a0beyond the period of one year from the date of filing of return. His order had not been challenged by the Department or the assessee and as a result such order had attained finality. In the absence of challenge to the order under rule\u00a040(1)\u00a0the assessee was not entitled to waiver of interest for a period of one year and was entitled to the benefit of order passed under rule\u00a040(1)\u00a0only to the extent stated therein and was liable to pay the balance amount according to the order of the Deputy Commissioner. Order of Tribunal is affirmed. (AY. 1985-86)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 215 : Interest payable by assessee-Advance tax  short of assessed tax-Fresh assessment made by Assessing Officer giving effect to Commissioner\u2019s revision order constitute a regular assessment-Entitle to waiver of interest only to extent stated in order under Rule 40(1). [S. 139(8),  215(4), 215(6), 263] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26711","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-6WP","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26711","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26711"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26711\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":26712,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26711\/revisions\/26712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}