{"id":27362,"date":"2022-06-20T14:28:46","date_gmt":"2022-06-20T08:58:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org-omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org\/"},"modified":"2022-06-20T14:28:46","modified_gmt":"2022-06-20T08:58:46","slug":"omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org-omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org-omega-investments-and-properties-ltd-v-cit-bomhc-www-itatonline-org\/","title":{"rendered":"Omega Investments and Properties Ltd v. CIT ( Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org Omega Investments and Properties Ltd v. CIT ( Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The original assessment of the appellant was completed u\/s 143(3) of the Act wherein the deduction u\/s 80IB(10) was allowed . For the Assessment year 2009-10 the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim on the ground that the approval was granted on 7 -10-2002 hence the Assessee is not eligible for deduction u\/s 80IB(10) of the Act . CIT(A) allowed the claim\u00a0 which was affirmed by the Tribunal and appeal of the revenue was dismissed by the High Court . While the deciding\u00a0 the appeal for the Assessment year 2007 -08 the CIT (A)) \u00a0following the order for the Assessment year 2009 -10 decided the issue on merit as well as on reopening of assessment in favour of the assessee. Revenue\u00a0 filed an appeal before the Tribunal . Tribunal without following the order of the Tribunal for the Assessment year 2009-10 followed the order of the Tribunal in the case of Bhavya Construction v. ACIT ( 2017 77 taxmann.com 66 ( Mum) ( Trib) and allowed the appeal of the revenue . The Assessee filed Miscellaneous petition which was\u00a0 dismissed .\u00a0\u00a0 The assessee filed an appeal as \u00a0well as writ before the High Court .\u00a0 Allowing the petition the Court held that the \u00a0Tribunal\u00a0 cannot differ from earlier\u00a0 order of Tribunal in assessee\u2019s own case and follow\u00a0 order of Tribunal in another assessee. In case the Tribunal desires to differ from earlier order the matter has to be referred to larger Bench . The Court also held that the Tribunal should have considered the\u00a0\u00a0 Order of the High court which was placed on record through rectification application. The order of the Tribunal was quashed and set aside with the direction that the Tribunal should decide the appeal afresh on its own merits in the light of observations made in the order .\u00a0\u00a0 (ITA No. 127 of 2021, WP No. 1217\u00a0 of 2020 dt 7 -6 -2022 )(AY.\u00a0 2007 -08)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal \u2013  Duties- Housing project &#8211; Tribunal  cannot differ from earlier  order of Tribunal in assessee\u2019s own case and follow the order of Tribunal in another assessee &#8211;  The matter has to be referred to larger Bench in case the Tribunal  desires to differ from earlier order of the Tribunal &#8211;   The Tribunal should have considered the   order of the High court which was placed on record through rectification application- Order of Tribunal is set aside .  [ S. 80IB(10) , 254(2, 260A, Art , 226  ]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-77k","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27362"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27362\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27363,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27362\/revisions\/27363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}