{"id":27808,"date":"2022-06-26T22:38:57","date_gmt":"2022-06-26T17:08:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hari-narain-gattani-v-dy-cit-2021-199-dtr-121-jaipurtrib\/"},"modified":"2022-06-26T22:38:57","modified_gmt":"2022-06-26T17:08:57","slug":"hari-narain-gattani-v-dy-cit-2021-199-dtr-121-jaipurtrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hari-narain-gattani-v-dy-cit-2021-199-dtr-121-jaipurtrib\/","title":{"rendered":"Hari Narain Gattani v. Dy. CIT (2021) 199 DTR 121 (Jaipur)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the course of survey excess cash was found. The assessee surrendered the amount and offered as business income while filing the return of income. The income was assessed u\/s 143 (3) of the Act and tax was determined at as per slab\u00a0 rate of taxation applicable to individual at 30%. The Assessing Officer issued the notice u\/s. 154 of the Act, and passed the order levying the\u00a0\u00a0 tax at 60% as per section 155BBE of the Act.\u00a0 On appeal CIT(A) affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. On appeal the Tribunal held that\u00a0 since there was no finding\u00a0 in the assessment order that\u00a0 income surrendered\u00a0 is assessable as per section 155BBE of the Act, the order under section 154 is not sustainable. (AY. 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Surrendered income-Survey-Business income-Increasing  the rate of tax from 30 percent to  60 percent and levying surcharge and cess on  undisclosed income is held to be not valid. [S.  68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C, 69D, 115BBE, 131, 133A]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-7ew","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27808"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27809,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27808\/revisions\/27809"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}