{"id":28435,"date":"2022-07-12T17:54:36","date_gmt":"2022-07-12T12:24:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/schneider-electric-south-east-asia-hq-pte-ltd-v-acitit-2022-443-itr-186-213-dtr-134-326-ctr-374-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2022-10-26T10:53:05","modified_gmt":"2022-10-26T05:23:05","slug":"schneider-electric-south-east-asia-hq-pte-ltd-v-acitit-2022-443-itr-186-213-dtr-134-326-ctr-374-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/schneider-electric-south-east-asia-hq-pte-ltd-v-acitit-2022-443-itr-186-213-dtr-134-326-ctr-374-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Schneider Electric South East Asia (HQ) Pte Ltd. v. ACIT(IT) (2022) 443 ITR 186 \/ 213 DTR 134 \/ 326 CTR 374 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee\u2019s application for grant of immunity from penalty under section\u00a0270A\u00a0was rejected on the ground that the assessee did not fall within the scope and ambit of section\u00a0270AA. On a writ petition contending that the order having been passed beyond the period of one month from the end of the month in which the assessee had filed the application seeking immunity was barred by limitation in terms of section\u00a0270AA(4) of the Act. Allowing the petition the Court held that the order of the Assessing Officer denying the benefit of immunity from penalty on the ground that the penalty was initiated under section\u00a0270A\u00a0for misreporting of income was not only erroneous but also arbitrary and bereft of any reason since in the penalty notice he had failed to specify the limb-under-reporting or misreporting of income, under which the penalty proceedings had been initiated and how the ingredients of sub-section (9) of section\u00a0270A\u00a0were satisfied. In the absence of such particulars, the mere reference to the word \u201cmisreporting\u201d in the assessment order to deny immunity from imposition of penalty and prosecution made the order manifestly arbitrary. The entire edifice of the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer was actually voluntary computation of income filed by the assessee to buy peace and avoid litigation, which fact had been duly noted and accepted in the assessment order and consequently, there was no question of any misreporting. The action of the Assessing Officer was contrary to the legislative intent of section\u00a0270AA. Therefore, the order passed under section\u00a0270AA(4)\u00a0rejecting the assessee\u2019s application for immunity from penalty was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to grant immunity under section\u00a0270AA\u00a0to the assessee. Court observed that the legislative intent of section\u00a0270AA\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Act, 1961\u00a0is to encourage or incentivize a taxpayer to\u00a0 fast-track settlement of issues, recover tax demands, and\u00a0 reduce protracted litigation. (AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 270A : Penalty for under-reporting and misreporting of income-Grant of  immunity from penalty and prosecution-Voluntary computation of income filed  to buy peace and avoid litigation-Failure to specify in penalty notice whether proceedings initiated for under-reporting or misreporting-Granted immunity. [S. 270AA(4),  Art. 226]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-7oD","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28435"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30572,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28435\/revisions\/30572"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}