{"id":28900,"date":"2022-07-30T12:14:00","date_gmt":"2022-07-30T06:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ppg-coatings-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-93-itr-52-sn-mum-trib\/"},"modified":"2022-07-30T12:14:00","modified_gmt":"2022-07-30T06:44:00","slug":"ppg-coatings-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-93-itr-52-sn-mum-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ppg-coatings-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2022-93-itr-52-sn-mum-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"PPG Coatings India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2022) 93 ITR 52 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the requisite details were submitted and the authorities below had failed to consider them and instead held that proper details were not submitted after having held that there was no benefit to the assessee from the licence That the authorities below had erred in holding the arm\u2019s length price at nil on the ground that relevant documents had not been submitted. The details as regards the issue of cost sharing had been submitted and the authorities below had erred in ignoring them. The assessee had discharged the onus cast upon it. The determination of arm\u2019s length price at nil without following one of the methods prescribed under section\u00a092C\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Act, 1961, read with rule\u00a010B\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Rules, 1962, was not sustainable. (AY.2008-09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Purchase of  sap licence-Details submitted but authorities failing to consider-Application of  benefit test instead of  methodology set out in Act and rules not sustainable. [R. 10B]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-7w8","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28900"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28900\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28901,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28900\/revisions\/28901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}