{"id":29832,"date":"2022-09-17T18:34:42","date_gmt":"2022-09-17T13:04:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/te-connectivity-india-pvt-ltd-v-dcit-2022-the-chambers-journal-april-p-96-karnhc\/"},"modified":"2023-03-07T23:04:43","modified_gmt":"2023-03-07T17:34:43","slug":"te-connectivity-india-pvt-ltd-v-dcit-2022-the-chambers-journal-april-p-96-karnhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/te-connectivity-india-pvt-ltd-v-dcit-2022-the-chambers-journal-april-p-96-karnhc\/","title":{"rendered":"TE Connectivity India Pvt Ltd v. DCIT  ( 2022)   138 taxmann.com 148  \/The Chamber\u2019s Journal \u2013April &#8211; P. 96 ( Karn)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Appellate Tribunal order dated 3-11 -2016\u00a0 set aside the assessment order and remanded the proceeding to the AO for a fresh decision. \u00a0The PCIT had received the copy of order on 29 -12 -2016 .The time limit for completion of assessment\u00a0 in terms of section 153(3) would be nine months from end of the financial year in which the order was received under section 254 of the Act . The order required to be passed on 31 -12 -2017 as the financial year ending would have been 31 -3 -2017 . The TPO issued notice dated 9-7 -2021. The assessee filed writ petition and challenged the notice stating that it was barred by limitation\u00a0 and sought the refund of the amount with applicable interest u\/s 244 of the Act\u00a0 .\u00a0 The Court held that the notice is clearly barred by limitation and directed the Department\u00a0 to refund the amount in excess of admitted liability along with interest\u00a0 .\u00a0\u00a0 ( WP No. 13646 \/ 2021\u00a0\u00a0 dt . 2-2 -2022 )( AY. 2006 -07 )<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 153 : Assessment \u2013 Reassessment \u2013 Limitation \u2013 Tribunal remanding back for denovo adjudication   &#8211; Notice beyond limitation period was quashed \u2013 Directed to refund the amount in excess of admitted liability along with interest [  S. 92CA(3A), s153 (4), 240 , 244 , 254(1), Art , 226 ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-7La","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29832"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29832\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33183,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29832\/revisions\/33183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}