{"id":30886,"date":"2022-12-06T10:39:02","date_gmt":"2022-12-06T05:09:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-v-acit-2022-136-taxmann-com-434-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-acit-v-kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-2022447-itr-364-sc\/"},"modified":"2022-12-06T10:39:02","modified_gmt":"2022-12-06T05:09:02","slug":"kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-v-acit-2022-136-taxmann-com-434-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-acit-v-kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-2022447-itr-364-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-v-acit-2022-136-taxmann-com-434-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-acit-v-kalpataru-land-pvt-ltd-2022447-itr-364-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Kalpataru Land Pvt. Ltd v. ACIT ( 2022) 136 taxmann.com 434 (Bom) (HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue dismissed ACIT . v. Kalpataru Land Pvt. Ltd. (2022)447 ITR 364 (SC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition the Court held that during assessment proceedings assessee-company in support of increase in its authorized share capital had produced evidences in form of details of share allotment, names and addresses of parties from whom share premium was received etc. and Assessing Officer after considering same had finalized assessment and passed assessment order, subsequent reopening of assessment on same issue was purely on change of opinion . Reassessment notice was quashed . Referred Crompton Greaves Ltd.\u00a0v.\u00a0ACIT (2015)\u00a0 229 Taxman 545\/ 275 CTR 49 ( Bom)( HC) . (AY. 2013 -14\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment \u2013With in four years-  Share capital \u2013 Share premium \u2013 Income from other sources \u2013 Produced evidence in support  of increase of authorised share capital , share allotment and names and address of parties  from whom share premium received \u2013 Change of opinion \u2013 Reassessment was quashed .   [ S. 56 (2)(viib), 148   Art , 226  ] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-82a","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30886"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30886\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30887,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30886\/revisions\/30887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}