{"id":31128,"date":"2022-12-10T12:54:13","date_gmt":"2022-12-10T07:24:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bharath-wind-farm-ltd-v-dcit-2022-194-itd-636-chennai-trib\/"},"modified":"2022-12-10T12:54:13","modified_gmt":"2022-12-10T07:24:13","slug":"bharath-wind-farm-ltd-v-dcit-2022-194-itd-636-chennai-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bharath-wind-farm-ltd-v-dcit-2022-194-itd-636-chennai-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Bharath Wind Farm Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 194 ITD 636 (Chennai) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee credited CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) to revenue account and debited CDM revenue receivable account.\u00a0 However, subsequently CER (Carbon Emission Reduction) market crashed and as a result, assessee did not make efforts to get CERs certified.\u00a0 Income booked during assessment year 2010-11 was reversed during year which was claimed in computation of income. \u00a0The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim.\u00a0 Commissioner (Appeals) held that amount receivable on account of CERs was capital in nature and therefore subsequent write back could not result in an allowable deduction. On appeal the Tribunal held the assessee&#8217;s action of offering income to tax, would entitle him to claim expenditure if ultimately receipts could not be realized by assessee which is\u00a0 based on principal of equity and natural justice; therefore, on given facts and circumstances, claim made by assessee was an allowable deduction and Assessing Officer was to be directed to grant deduction as claimed by assessee. (AY. 2013-14)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Carbon Emission reduction-Offered as income in earlier years-Entitle to claim as expenditure if ultimately receipts could not be realized. [S. 4]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-864","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31128"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31129,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31128\/revisions\/31129"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}