{"id":32957,"date":"2023-02-25T11:55:32","date_gmt":"2023-02-25T06:25:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hiraben-pragibhai-tala-v-acit-2023-450-itr-264-guj-hc\/"},"modified":"2023-02-25T11:55:32","modified_gmt":"2023-02-25T06:25:32","slug":"hiraben-pragibhai-tala-v-acit-2023-450-itr-264-guj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hiraben-pragibhai-tala-v-acit-2023-450-itr-264-guj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Hiraben Pragibhai Tala v. ACIT (2023) 450 ITR 264 (Guj.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On writ the Court held that no draft assessment order with show-cause notice as required under section\u00a0144B(1)\u00a0and section\u00a0144B(7)\u00a0was given to the assessee so as to enable the assessee to give an explanation regarding the proposed addition. The order was passed by the respondent in violation of principles of natural justice without affording an opportunity of personal hearing by not following the prescribed procedure laid down in terms of the provisions of section\u00a0144B\u00a0of the Act, for faceless assessment. Hence the order of assessment passed by the respondent under section\u00a0143(3)\u00a0read with section\u00a0254\u00a0read with section\u00a0144B\u00a0dated September 20, 2021 and demand notice under section 156 of the even date was\u00a0\u00a0 quashed and set aside.\u00a0 The Revenue was directed to pass the order giving an opportunity of hearing and in accordance with as per the provisions of section 144B of the Act. (AY-2006-07)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Effect from 1-4-2021-Objection to draft assessment order must be considered-Order passed  without considering objections is held to be not valid. [S. 144B(7), 144B(1)(xii),    Art. 226]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-32957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-8zz","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32957"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32958,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32957\/revisions\/32958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}