{"id":33092,"date":"2023-03-01T16:30:21","date_gmt":"2023-03-01T11:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hardev-singh-v-ito-2022-214-dtr-146-326-ctr-875-140-taxmann-com-67-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2023-03-01T16:30:21","modified_gmt":"2023-03-01T11:00:21","slug":"hardev-singh-v-ito-2022-214-dtr-146-326-ctr-875-140-taxmann-com-67-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hardev-singh-v-ito-2022-214-dtr-146-326-ctr-875-140-taxmann-com-67-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Hardev Singh v. ITO (2022) 214 DTR 146 \/ 326 CTR 875 \/ 140 taxmann.com 67 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On writ the Court held section 148A(c) casts a duty on Assessing Officer, to consider reply of assessee in response to notice under section 148A(b) before making an order under section 148A(d) of the Act. On facts the order was passed\u00a0 \u00a0under section 148A(d) had been passed after receipt of detailed reply by assessee, however, Assessing Officer had not considered reply of assessee, mandate of section 148A(c) had been violated.\u00a0 Therefore the \u00a0order under section 148A(d) and \u00a0notice under section 148 were to be quashed and matter was to be remanded back to Assessing Officer with a direction to decide notice under section 148A(b) by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law, after taking into account reply filed by assessee. (AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Failure to consider the reply of the assessee-Order was quashed and matter was to be remanded back to Assessing Officer with a direction to decide notice under section 148A(b) by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law, after taking into account reply filed by assessee. [S. 148A(c), 148A(d), Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-8BK","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33092"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33093,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33092\/revisions\/33093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}