{"id":35228,"date":"2023-08-01T16:46:35","date_gmt":"2023-08-01T11:16:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/chanchal-bhagwatilal-gokhru-v-uoi-2023-454-itr-451-152-taxmann-com-214-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2023-08-01T16:46:35","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T11:16:35","slug":"chanchal-bhagwatilal-gokhru-v-uoi-2023-454-itr-451-152-taxmann-com-214-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/chanchal-bhagwatilal-gokhru-v-uoi-2023-454-itr-451-152-taxmann-com-214-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Chanchal Bhagwatilal Gokhru v. UOI (2023) 454 ITR 451 \/ 152 taxmann.com 214 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition the Court held that since the notice under section\u00a0148\u00a0had been issued after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant AY. 2014-15 the Assessing Officer had to show that the jurisdictional requirement of failure on the part of the assessee to truly and fully disclose material facts during the original assessment was satisfied. The reasons recorded were premised on \u201cseen from the assessment records\u201d. The Assessing Officer had recorded that the assessee had claimed to have purchased shares of the penny stock scrips for a total of Rs. 33,09,976 and sold them for a consideration of Rs. 1,15,90,280 and that the long-term capital gains would be unexplained investment from other sources to obtain an equivalent amount of bogus profit on sale of shares and not capital gains as claimed by the assessee. There was nothing to indicate any failure by the assessee to disclose any material fact. According to the original assessment order under section\u00a0143(3)\u00a0the Assessing Officer had considered these very transactions and had made an addition of Rs. 1,07,18,922 to the assessee\u2019s income on which he had already paid the tax. There was no substance in the Assessing Officer\u2019s reason to believe that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment under section\u00a0147\u00a0inasmuch as there was no mention of any tangible material that had led to his conclusion. The reopening of assessment was on a change of opinion which was impermissible. It was evident that bald assertions of the transaction being \u201can accommodation entry made in collusion and connivance with the entry provider\u201d were used to reopen the assessment. The notice was quashed and set aside. All subsequent proceedings were prohibited. (AY.2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment \u2013 After the expiry of four years &#8211; Penny Stock -Share transactions and tax paid on added income &#8211; No new tangible material \u2013 Accommodation entries &#8211; Reconsideration of the material available at the time of original assessment proceedings is tantamount to change of opinion &#8211; Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed. [S. 10(38), 45 69, 148, Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9ac","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35228"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35228\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35229,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35228\/revisions\/35229"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}