{"id":3530,"date":"2019-01-01T09:42:21","date_gmt":"2019-01-01T09:42:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kanta-sharma-v-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india-2018-259-taxman-376-delhi-hc\/"},"modified":"2019-12-20T17:34:41","modified_gmt":"2019-12-20T17:34:41","slug":"kanta-sharma-v-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india-2018-259-taxman-376-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kanta-sharma-v-institute-of-chartered-accountants-of-india-2018-259-taxman-376-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Kanta Sharma  v. Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (2018) 259 Taxman 376  (Delhi)( HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the petition the Court held that ,failure to sign undertaking, to abide by Act, Rules and Regulations had to be viewed as of a serious character and showed that petitioner, in event of being elected, did not intend to comply with Act, Rules and Regulations . Accordingly once statute provides for rejection of nomination for non-compliance with rules 9, 10 and 11, question of petitioner being permitted to contest election did not arise and, therefore, writ petition was to be dismissed .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chartered Accountants Act, 1949,<br \/>\nS.10: Failure to append her signatures at places earmarked therefor in nomination form, petitioner&#8217;s nomination was rightly rejected by ICAI for non-compliance of statutory rules 9, 10 and 11 of Chartered Accountants (Election to Council) Rules, 2006 and petitioner could not contest election- Petition is dismissed .[ Rules, 9, 10, 11]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allied-laws","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-UW","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3530"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8751,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3530\/revisions\/8751"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}