{"id":35318,"date":"2023-08-01T17:02:40","date_gmt":"2023-08-01T11:32:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/prakash-krishnavtar-bhardwaj-v-ito-2023-451-itr-27-331-ctr-64-150-taxmann-com-60-293-taxman-132-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2023-08-01T17:02:40","modified_gmt":"2023-08-01T11:32:40","slug":"prakash-krishnavtar-bhardwaj-v-ito-2023-451-itr-27-331-ctr-64-150-taxmann-com-60-293-taxman-132-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/prakash-krishnavtar-bhardwaj-v-ito-2023-451-itr-27-331-ctr-64-150-taxmann-com-60-293-taxman-132-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Prakash Krishnavtar Bhardwaj v. ITO (2023) 451 ITR 27 \/ 331 CTR 64 \/ 150 taxmann.com 60 \/ 293 Taxman 132 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition, the Court held that the notice issued under section\u00a0148\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Act, 1961 has no signature of the Assessing Officer affixed on it, digitally or manually, was invalid, and would not vest the Assessing Officer with any further jurisdiction to proceed with the reassessment under section\u00a0147. Consequently, the Assessing Officer could not assume jurisdiction to proceed with the reassessment proceedings. The notice having been sought to be issued after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year 2015-16 any steps taken by the Assessing Officer the notice issued under section\u00a0148A(b)\u00a0and the order passed under section\u00a0148A(d)\u00a0were without jurisdiction and therefore, arbitrary and contrary to article\u00a014\u00a0of the\u00a0Constitution of India\u00a0and consequently set aside. (AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice \u2013 After three years from the end of relevant assessment year &#8211; Service of notice without the signature of Assessing Officer digitally or manually-Notice invalid \u2013 Order and notice was quashed and set aside. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 14, 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9bE","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35318"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35318\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35319,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35318\/revisions\/35319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}