{"id":3570,"date":"2019-01-04T06:23:43","date_gmt":"2019-01-04T06:23:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ito-v-anil-batra-2018-409-itr-428-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2019-01-04T06:23:43","modified_gmt":"2019-01-04T06:23:43","slug":"ito-v-anil-batra-2018-409-itr-428-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ito-v-anil-batra-2018-409-itr-428-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"ITO  v. Anil Batra. (2018) 409 ITR 428 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Court held that S.\u00a0278B\u00a0of the Act,\u00a0 makes the directors of the company in charge of its affairs liable for the offence committed by it unless the presumption is rebutted by such director. For the purpose of S.\u00a0278B\u00a0once the offence is shown to have been committed by the company, then the liability of the directors in charge of its affairs is attracted. The burden then shifts to such directors to show that the offence occurred without their knowledge or that they had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence. Allowing the petitions of the revenue, the Court held that, the \u00a0directors of the company were convicted for the offence under section\u00a0276B\u00a0for the three assessment years in question 1982-83 to 1984-85. Both the lower criminal courts had erred in acquitting the directors of the assessee only because they were not issued separate show-cause notices. Both the directors had signed the company&#8217;s balance-sheets and therefore their defence that they were not in charge of the affairs of the company was untenable. Considering that the matters pertained to the assessment years 1982-83 to 1984-85 and given the long pendency of the matters, the directors were given the benefit of probation. Accordingly, while sentencing the directors to pay a fine of Rs. 50,000 each for the offence under section\u00a0276B\u00a0for each of the assessment years in question and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for seven days, they were granted the benefit of probation and directed to file a bond of good behaviour in the trial court in the sum of Rs.10,000 each for the period of six months. The judgments of the District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge and the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate were set aside. (AY. 1982-83 1983-84 &amp; 1984-85)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source\u2013Directors in charge, to show that offence occurred without their knowledge or due diligence exercised by them to prevent commission of offence-Non-issuance of separate notices, does not absolve directors in charge-Order f lower courts acquitting directors is held to be  erroneous-Benefit of probation granted to accused directors of assessee and levy of fine.  [S. 2(35), 278B]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-VA","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}