{"id":36393,"date":"2023-08-29T12:58:53","date_gmt":"2023-08-29T07:28:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/toyota-boshoku-automotive-india-pvt-ltd-v-acit-202298-itr-363-bang-trib-2\/"},"modified":"2023-08-29T12:58:53","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T07:28:53","slug":"toyota-boshoku-automotive-india-pvt-ltd-v-acit-202298-itr-363-bang-trib-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/toyota-boshoku-automotive-india-pvt-ltd-v-acit-202298-itr-363-bang-trib-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Toyota Boshoku Automotive India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2022)98 ITR 363 (Bang.)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held, that, the decision of the Tribunal in the assessee\u2019s own case for the assessment year 2013-14, wherein the facts were identical, since the assessee had leveraged the use of technology from the associated enterprise without contributing any unique intangible to the transaction, the transactional profit split method could not be applied to determine the arm\u2019s length price of the assessee\u2019s international transactions with its associated enterprise and the Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to apply the transactional net margin method as the most appropriate one to determine the arm\u2019s length price. (AY. 2016-17)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Profit split method inappropriate-Assessee made no unique intangible contribution-Transactional net margin method appropriate-TPO to recompute arm\u2019s length price. [S.92CA,  144C]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9sZ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36393"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36394,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36393\/revisions\/36394"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}