{"id":37410,"date":"2023-09-07T14:54:10","date_gmt":"2023-09-07T09:24:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023453-itr-31-sc-editorial-pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023-453-itr-24-rajhc-is-affirmed\/"},"modified":"2023-09-07T14:54:10","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T09:24:10","slug":"pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023453-itr-31-sc-editorial-pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023-453-itr-24-rajhc-is-affirmed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023453-itr-31-sc-editorial-pcit-v-vaibhav-global-ltd-2023-453-itr-24-rajhc-is-affirmed\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Vaibhav Global Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 31 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Vaibhav Global Ltd. (2023) 453 ITR 24 (Raj)(HC) is affirmed."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The High Court dismissed the Department\u2019s appeal on the questions whether the Tribunal was justified in restricting the adjustment on account of interest-free loans advanced to associated enterprises to prevailing LIBOR +2 per cent., deleting the adjustment on account of corporate guarantee, allowing the write off of loss on account of investment in equity shares of one of its subsidiary, allowing the write-off of investment\u00a0 for the purpose of computing \u201cbook profits\u201d under section\u00a0115JB, remitting back the issues of disallowance out of provision for doubtful loans to a subsidiary and of disallowance out of bad debts provision claimed in minimum alternate tax to the Assessing Officer for verification.\u00a0 SLP of Revenue is dismissed. (AY. 2009-10)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price -Adjustment on account of  interest-free loans-Libor +2 Per Cent.-Corporate guarantee-Write-off  of loss on account of  investment in equity shares in subsidiary -Book profits -Provision for doubtful debts -No question of law -Order of High Court affirmed -SLP of Revenue is  dismissed. [S. 92B, 115JB, Art. 136] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9Jo","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37410"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37411,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37410\/revisions\/37411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}